Woolwich attack – Govt say ‘it’s terrorism’

UPDATE:  CONFIRMED.  Woolwich attack was carried out by Muslims.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/05/muslims-screaming-allahu-akbar-behead-british-soldier-on-public-street.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

The just released news that the British govt has declared the Woolwich attack on a serving soldier is being treated as terrorism raises speculation as to who could do this.

The target, the area, the level of violence, all seem to be consistent with the modus operandi of bestial Islamic thugs from around the world.  The media is speaking of this in the same breath as other ‘home grown’ Islamic terror plots, such as the Glasgow Airport attack, and it is highly likely that this attack will have an Islamic element.

I would not put money on this not having a Bearded Savage connection.   If it does then it really must be a sign that action and not words is required from govt to deal with the problems caused by our Islamic guests, many of whom are showing that they at the least possess questionable loyalty to the UK.

16 Comments on "Woolwich attack – Govt say ‘it’s terrorism’"

  1. Been on the cards for a while now. What will happen will be calls for calm, a moderate muslim or two will be wheeled out to say ‘this isn’t islam’ and walk away sniggering.
    Those of us who have been bringing this to the public’s notice for years will still be called fascist/racist/bigots.
    What we saw today was the real islam.

    • Fahrenheit211 | May 22, 2013 at 6:35 pm |

      Most definitely the ‘real’ Islam. Killing our troops on the streets of London surely must the the wake-up call that people need? Those idiot liberal Christians and Jews who sit on interfaith committees with those who follow the ideology of Islam, need to examine their consciences and consider just what sort of ideologies they are helping to promote.

    • “What will happen will be calls for calm, a moderate muslim or two will be wheeled out to say ‘this isn’t islam’ and walk away sniggering.”

      Already done! I’m listening to Radio 2 ‘Thought for the Day’ now, describing the MCB statement as ‘brave’.

      • Fahrenheit211 | May 23, 2013 at 7:04 am |

        Julia, the MCB is talking complete bullshit they are not a completely ‘clean hands’ organisation as others have found out. MCB are the scum who boycotted the national Holocaust Memorial Day because the organisers would not bow to MCB’s request to include murdered Muslims in HMD. Maybe MCB need a history lesson because Muslims fought FOR Hitler not against him. Also the Islamic death toll over the last Millenium is alleged to be higher than even Stalin managed, and he wiped out 50 million people. People should just ignore the whines and lies coming out of the mouths of MCB and the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, because lies, Taqqiya and bullshit is all that seems to emanate from too many of Britain’s Islamic representative organisations.

        As for the BBC well the never seem to meet an Islamic terror apologist that they didn’t want to fellate.

  2. James Strong | May 22, 2013 at 8:46 pm |

    So far, at 9.40pm on Wednesday the government are calling it terrorism but they are not saying it was muslim terrorism, or jihadi terrorism.Cowards.

    The Spectator Coffee House, to its shame, has reproduced a number of tweets saying ‘this is notthe real Islam’ but has closed comments.

    This killing shows there are residents, possibly citizens, of this country who are enemies of this country. It was foreseeable by anyone who has made any study of Islam.

    • Fahrenheit211 | May 22, 2013 at 9:03 pm |

      I’ve heard Sky refer to it as ‘Islamist’ terror or ‘home grown’ terror. Either way it is still Islamic terror. Muslim scum have still killed a British soldier on the streets of the Capital. The cowards both in the media and politics and elsewhere are terrified to call this evil by its name, which is Jihad.

      I’ve just caught out of the corner of my ear that a mosque in Essex has been attacked in retaliation for the attack on the soldier in Woolwich. I have not found confirmation of this as yet, but if what I heard is correct, then it is as I sadly predicted in previous articles, which is that if the evil of Islam is not countered by the proper agencies that should be working in our interests, then hotheads will become angered and emboldened.

      This mans death is the result of having security and other agencies which are hampered by political correctness and a political class which adheres to the false ideology of multiculturalism which treats both the civilised and the uncivilised as equal.

  3. Fahrenheit211 | May 22, 2013 at 11:03 pm |

    From Elsewhere: The Commentator also had coverage of this case and there is some particularily righteously angry comments on that story.

    http://www.thecommentator.com/article/3603/major_incident_in_south_london_with_reports_of_shootings_and_a_beheading

  4. These two are claiming to be soldiers of Islam. Its a shame thatLooks like the 1947 amendment to article 3 of the Geneva convention probably bans the summary execution of these two as Franc Tireurs but it might be an idea to thoroughly research it. I am sure there would be no shortage of volunteers for the firing squad.

    • Fahrenheit211 | May 25, 2013 at 5:59 pm |

      According to Wiki: “The Geneva Conventions established new protocols, namely, according to Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention of 1949, francs-tireurs are entitled to prisoner-of-war status provided that they are commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates, have a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance, carry arms openly, and conduct their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.”

      Well these two killers were not commanded by a person responsible, did not have a fixed distinctive sign on them and quite plainly has not conducted their operation in accordance with the laws and customs of War. Sounds like it would be quite legit for anyone who was authorised and in possession of a weapon to have killed them because they are not fighters who are liable to be subject to POW status.

Comments are closed.