Racism and threats of violence at an election, another unwanted gift from the ideology of Islam.

The Conservative MP for Ilford North in East London, Mr Lee Scott.

Yesterday (10/06/2014) I wrote about how the Labour party is sucking up to Islam in the London Borough of Redbridge. Today I have to bring you another worrying Redbridge story which is also about the corrupt and violent ideology of Islam’s involvement in politics in that borough. There appears to have been in Redbridge a rise in Labour Party appeasement of Islam and also a rise in threats against those who Islam sees as political opponents. This has led to a rise in political anti-Semitism being used against the Conservative MP for Ilford North Mr Lee Scott (Ilford South is represented by the Labour foreigner fellator Mike Gapes).

During the 2010 General Election Mr Scott was ambushed by a man who called him a ‘dirty Jew’ which quite obviously disturbed Mr Scott. He has also had death threats from various people and who has been called ‘an enemy of Islam’ in a leaflet put out by an anonymous, presumably Islamic group.

On the 7th May 2014, Mr Scott spoke to the House of Commons during a debate on conduct during elections and this is what, according to Hansard, the Parliamentary publication of record, Mr Scott said:

“I start by thanking the hon. Member for North East Derbyshire (Natascha Engel) and her committee for all the work they have done, and I thank her for securing today’s debate. Originally, I was not going to speak in this debate—I know that many people say in debates that it was not their intention to speak, but it genuinely was not. However, I would like briefly to touch on what happened, the consequences of that, and on what is still happening because of the events that took place before the 2010 general election.

At that election, I remember very clearly that on a Friday, I was walking back to my car when two gentlemen—I use the word “gentlemen” very loosely—approached me, called me a dirty Jew and said they were going to kill me. I thought that was a bit extreme—not voting for me would have sufficed, but killing me seemed a little extreme—and I did what I normally do when I am particularly scared, and that is to use humour. I said, “I will put you down as a possible. You haven’t decided how you’re voting, have you?” They were as shocked by that as I was, and we ran off in separate directions.

Consequently, a week later, somebody gave me a leaflet that had been distributed in the area saying that I was an enemy of Islam, with a picture of me wearing a skull cap—it could only have been taken in a synagogue, which I felt was a bit wrong—and had statements on there that were totally wrong. It put words into my mouth that I had never said; none the less, it was given out and as the hon. Member for North East Derbyshire said, there was no imprint on the bottom. I was quite surprised when some of the authorities asked me, “Was there an imprint on the bottom?” I said, “When people are threatening to kill you, they do not usually say who they are.” None the less, the leaflet went out with quite a wide circulation.

That was some four years ago, so you would have thought, Mrs Main, that that has all died down, that it is history, that I won at the election and it is finished, but sadly it is not. I still regularly get e-mails saying that I should be stoned to death. Again, I am not quite sure why; none the less, I get them. After speaking in January at the Holocaust memorial day debate that we had in the Chamber, I also received a letter—again, there was no address on it—calling me a dirty Jew and saying that I should be killed for speaking up against people killing Jews. I found the whole thing ironic and stupid and said to the police that I did not want it taken any further, because it would have wasted valuable time on somebody who is not worthy of wasting any time on.

However, the consequences of what is stirred up at a general election—whether, in my case, because I am Jewish, or in somebody else’s case, because of their sexuality, or maybe other religions, or the colour of their skin—goes on for years afterwards. Sadly, anyone can google my name and the names of other hon. Members of the House and see some of the vile things that are on the net today.”

Although anti-Semites, racialists and those who hate gay people can come from all backgrounds, it must not be denied that there is a growing Islamic element in the sort of electoral misconduct described by Mr Scott. For example the Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK, one of a number of faux-moderate Islamic groups that are out there, makes it plain that it loves the Islam appeasing Labour MP for East Ham, Stephen Timms, in the neighbouring London Borough of Newham.

Members of MPAC have also been involved in a blatantly anti-Semitic campaign in the Oldham and Saddleworth constituency in 2010, where their activists ran a ‘Don’t Vote For the Jew’ campaign against the now disgraced, non-Jewish, Labour MP, Phil Woolas. MPAC activists had targeted Mr Woolas because he supported the intervention in Iraq and also was a supporter of the right of the State of Israel to exist.

Many readers will concur with Mr Scott’s fears that this sort of electoral misconduct and electoral violence will only get worse. It is likely to get worse as long as we tolerate Islamic political violence in our electoral system. Labour in Redbridge have plainly decided that they will sell their collective souls to Islam, they rubbed the noses of the electors of Hainault with this fact by having a Muslim Hustings that only appeared to be attended by Labour candidates, and who described Labour as the ‘only non-racist party’.

Labour’s Islamo-phillia will in time make life very bad for the Jews, Christians, Hindus and Sikhs of Redbridge. If Labour is not opposed effectively at the General Election in 2015, there is a real chance that Redbridge, which was once a place where people aspired to live in, will turn into another Islam influenced craphole like the boroughs of Newham and Waltham Forest have become.

Islam is bringing violence and corruption into our political system. These examples from Redbridge can go alongside the examples from Tower Hamlets and the Trojan Horse plot and the long political silence over the problem of Islamic grooming gangs. We cannot, and must not ignore this and other problems anymore, and we should no longer shy away from naming what this problem is and what ideology is behind it. The enemy of freedom and justice and peaceful co-existence between those of differing beliefs, has a name, and its name is Islam. It is futile to appease such an enemy but it is imperative for the future of our children and grandchildren, that it is fought, and fought through the court of public opinion, the ballot box and the ‘flat ephemeral pamphlet’.

Links

Hansard entry for Mr Scott’s address to the House of Commons

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140507/halltext/140507h0001.htm#140507104000254

Mr Scott’s comment from his website (contains link to Hansard)

http://www.lee-scott.org.uk/news/lee-scott-speaks-debate-electoral-conduct

Jewish Chronicle story about anti-Semitic abuse of Mr Scott in Rebridge.

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/107849/mp-lee-scott-i-cried-over-death-threat

Previous Redbridge Labour story from this blog

https://www.fahrenheit211.net/2014/06/10/redbridge-labour-gain-from-the-whipped-mosque-vote-and-islamist-doctor-boasts/

Stephen Timms the Labour MP for East Ham, arch Islam appeaser

https://www.fahrenheit211.net/2013/10/28/stephen-timms-the-member-for-islamabad-west/

Wikpedia entry on Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Public_Affairs_Committee_UK

Phil Woolas debarred from public office after lying about political opponent

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8114108/Labour-MP-Phil-Woolas-loses-seat-over-election-lies.html

5 Comments on "Racism and threats of violence at an election, another unwanted gift from the ideology of Islam."

  1. Woman on a Raft | June 11, 2014 at 1:24 pm |

    Labour’s Islamo-phillia will in time make life very bad for ….. Ed Miliband.

    • Fahrenheit211 | June 11, 2014 at 1:38 pm |

      We can but hope that Labour’s Islamo-philia will make life bad for Ed Miliband, but in areas like Redbridge and elsewhere, Labour’s Islam pandering will claim a whole lot more victims, many of them much more innocent than Miliband himself. You could say that the hundreds if not thousands of victims of Islamic Grooming Gangs are a direct result of Labour local admins turning a blind eye to the more challenging bits of the ideology of Islam.

  2. Chris Hicks | June 11, 2014 at 5:16 pm |

    labour are no longer the party my late father used to religiously vote for.
    I wouldn’t touch em with a barge pole.i sincerely hope they don’t triumph in the next general election.
    sadly the islamo facists and their apeasers will continue to destroy individual boroughs while the turkeys who’ve not conceded to white flight continue voting for christmas.

  3. No one has been caught and prosecuted re threats against Mr Scott … any attack on an MP is an attack on parliament and thus against the whole of the British electorate… failure to investigate this brings the whole system of law and order into disrepute and it also encourages the perpetrators.

Comments are closed.