This is, for me a troubling and difficult piece to write. Firstly because the case in question is sub judice and therefore merely an allegation at this stage, which means that I have to be careful what I write. Secondly, it’s difficult because, if this story is true, then it means that I’ve been proved right yet again about what happens when the State ignores people’s concerns about Islam and angry people start to take the law into their own hands.
Tower Hamlets in East London has been subjected to a massive amount of Islamification over recent years. It is an area that used to contain Christians of various denominations, Jews, atheists and others, along with a gay community that has been present since even before the Wolfenden Act of 1968 that legalised gay sex between men, but is now very much an Islamic area. It’s also a borough of extreme contrasts with the wealth and power of the new business districts at Canary Wharf alongside areas of extreme poverty, crime, ignorance and the death cult that is Islam.
The last decade or so has seen the politics of Tower Hamlets take on more and more of an Islamic flavour with Islamic extremists corrupting the voting system and manipulating Muslim voters for the benefit of the Muslim extremists who are associated with the East London Mosque and the South Asian Islamofascist group Jamaat e Islaami. Because of that, life for some non-Muslims there, especially those non-Muslims who refuse to go along with the multikulti bullshit,or those who speak up against the problems caused by Islam, is becoming quite unpleasant.
The police have done very little to correct or stop the problems of electoral corruption and there were allegations back in 2014 during local elections, that members of the Metropolitan Police stood by and did nothing at polling stations as Muslim activist supporters of the former now disgraced Mayor Lutfur Rahman, created what the Returning Officer at the time described as ‘an intimidatory atmosphere’. This was to many people’s eyes a disgusting dereliction of duty by the Met and was probably done in order to keep the local Muslims happy and give the police an easier time. The Met’s lack of action not just in 2014 but for many years previously on Islamic electoral corruption has fed the perception that the Met in Tower Hamlets go easy on Muslims but come down hard on anybody else. It’s never good for an area to have the reputation of being policed in such a biased way, and there must be many non-Muslims who feel that they cannot get proper justice when being victimised because the police there are so damned bent.
It’s the normal course of events that when the police and the state fail to deal with problems, even obvious problems like the Islamification of a borough and the effect it has on Christian, Jewish, female and Gay residents, then it creates the ideal conditions for vigilantism. The lack of action on Islamic problems can also give random hotheads the justification to have a go at equally random Muslims. People who are quite rightly pissed off with Islam and the problems it brings, who have been effectively abandoned by law enforcement and whose cries in the wilderness of places like Tower Hamlets are ignored or ridiculed, have little to lose by having a go back at members of a community, even innocent ones, that are increasingly being seen as oppressors and piss-takers.
The troubling case that has prompted me to write this piece appeared in the London Evening Standard on the 27th December 2015. It concerns a young Muslim man who alleges that he was ‘racially abused’ by some men in a van whilst the alleged victim was waiting for his wife and child. The alleged victim then claims that he was beaten up by the men who he says were saying things like ‘Paki’ and ‘Muslim’ to him whilst attacking him. Two men have been arrested in connection with this alleged offence and have since been released on police bail.
Many of this blog’s readers will notice the swiftness that the Met have acted in this case and will compare this swiftness of action with the lethargy with which the Met have approached the multiple Islam problems of Tower Hamlets. The Met have been extremely lethargic when dealing or failing to deal with, the massive industrial scale vote-rigging, the extremist connections of the East London Mosque and the ongoing problems of Islamic hate preachers, some of who are crossing the line by inciting violence against gays, Jews and other non-Muslims, and who operate with impunity throughout Tower Hamlets.
A bent police force such as exists in Tower Hamlets cannot and will not be trusted to police people equally and without fear or favour, and that is something that should worry everyone, no matter what their faith or race. When a police force becomes bent in this manner then it is only a matter of time before you get vigilante gangs and random attacks on innocent people who just happen to be of Muslim heritage or who merely have a brown skin. This is not good and is a sign of the sort of social, political and administrative breakdown, that occurs when the agents and organs of the state blatantly favour and pander to one particular loud and often violent confessional or cultural group and treat everyone else like dirt. In Tower Hamlets it’s acceptable to book a venue like the Waterlily and pack it with Islamic hate preachers calling for the deaths of Jews and gays and for the oppression of women and the police will do sweet FA about it. However those like Tommy Robinson who have attempted to peacefully highlight the problems caused by the extremist East London Mosque, have found themselves forbidden to enter the area of Tower Hamlets that contains the mosque and have been arrested for attempting to do so. The double standard with which the Met in Tower Hamlets treat Islam as opposed to those who question Islam, is glaring enough to catch the attention of even the least informed of citizens, and that is a dangerous situation for the Met to create.
As I’ve said often, far too often now, I told you what would happen if the pandering to Islam continued like it has, and it grieves me to be possibly proved right yet again. Anger at Islam and the crimes of Islam, along with anger at the favouring of Islam by the state and police forces is growing, and this anger can really only bring about a situation that is going to end very badly indeed. It’s not just Islam that destroys peace, but collaborating with it in a Quisling-like manner as the Met have done, also goes a long way in helping Islam destroy the peace of a society.
If the state doesn’t start to get a grip on Islam and the trouble it causes, then random attacks on random Muslims are going to be the least of societies problems, because the sort of conflict that could occur if law and order breaks down will be bloody, intensive and horrific, for everyone.
If we as a society want to avoid future conflict, including attacks on random Muslims, then it is imperative that Muslims are policed just as harshly as the rest of us are and are not allowed to get away with stuff that no other group appears to be allowed to get away with.
Links
Original crime report from the London Evening Standard
Other stories regarding Tower Hamlets from this blog
Abuses of electoral law at Tower Hamlets polling stations
British security service taking an interest in the Muslims of Tower Hamlets
Former local government minister sends in accountants to look over the books of Tower Hamlets
Misuse of grant system to favour Islamic groups in Tower Hamlets
Met Police act like ‘Shariah Police ‘ in Tower Hamlets
https://www.fahrenheit211.net/2013/06/29/metropolitan-police-enforcing-tower-hamlets-shariah-zone/
The aggressive Islamic conquest of Tower Hamlets
The non-Muslim Left backing Islamists in Tower Hamlets
Massive electoral corruption in Tower Hamlets
I suspect he knows his assailants. That’s why the swift arrest!
You may well be on the right track there. There could well be more to this case than meets the eye. Also the mendacious grievance mongering taqiyya artists of Tell Mama have been very quick to exploit this case, which always gives grounds for suspicion and concern.
O/T: but have tyou seen this?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3379197/Armed-police-called-multiple-people-stabbed-outside-Strangeways-Prison.html
A ‘group’ of men, eh?
That’s a very unusual report not just because of the vagueness and the dodgy MONA description but because there is no credible explanation why these men were fighting. Was it just a fight or was it some form of attack on the prison or a diversion to get thepolice etc busy while somethign worse happens elsewhere?
The report looks strained, like the reporter felt he or she was under constraints about what they could write, also why armed police for a mere scuffle? This story leaves more questions than it provides answers.