One of the first requirements for a civilised and cohesive society to enable it to function effectively is a fair legal system. There is even a Biblical commandment that decrees that courts of law should judge people equally and without fear or favour to either the powerful or the powerless. Fair legal systems are ones where justice is not bought and sold like so many items in a market. Such systems are also ones where the violent or potentially violent individuals and groups are not appeased nor ones where those who shout, whine and posture the most are treated advantageously.
Fair and honest courts are also ones that have proportionate sentences where punishments fit the crime and ones where no prisoner is subjected to either a greater or a lesser sentence than they deserve.
The commandment to have honest courts and the need for proportionate sentencing are things that came to mind when reading the outrageous story of two Polish-Britons who have been jailed for 8 months for throwing bacon at a mosque in North London. This is because the issues of fair justice and of tailoring the punishment to reflect the severity of a crime is very relevant in this case.
Firstly the ‘fair justice’ aspect. As I’ve been following this case from afar I’ve noticed that the police have put an awful lot of resources into this case. There’s been ‘reassurance patrols’ for Muslims of course along with simpering, patronising, pleading words from senior police officers about ‘hate crime’ and the necessity to tackle it. I’ve no doubt whatsoever in my mind that these verbal instances of police officers prioritising the capture of the perpetrators of what, in the great scheme of things is a very minor bit of anti-social behaviour, shows us that here we have a police force that has decided to sell justice and overtly pander to Islam. From what I can see these attitudes by police staff are also reflected in the amount of police resources allocated to this case. I can’t help but wonder how many burglaries in that area went un-investigated, how many drunk drivers who continued on their way unimpeded or how many muggings were ignored so that the police could concentrate on a bit of bacon throwing? My guess would be a lot.
Secondly there is the aspect of proportional sentencing. Now a while back I worked in a court environment and I saw loads of defendants sentenced to terms of imprisonment. Some of these were longer or shorter than I may have expected when considering the facts of the cases but very few of them were as disproportionate as the one handed out to these two Polish lads. These sentences are particularly disproportionately long when you sit and compare them with some of the sentences that Muslim offenders have got for crimes that are far, far worse than flinging a bit of bacon at a mosque. In one from 2014 case a Muslim Koran teacher who repeatedly sexually assaulted an 11 year old girl in his care was spared jail on the unbelievably frivolous grounds that his ‘ he and his wife were on benefits and wife could not speak English’. I’ve seen and read about some perplexing decisions by Judges in the past but this struck me as especially egregious. But this is not the only case where Muslims have been slapped on the wrist in cases where members of other groups have been slapped down. In mid 2016 a Muslim teenager who beat up and tortured his girlfriend was sentenced to custody but he will only serve 12 months of the 2 year period that he’s been sentenced to. This particular Muslim savage got only four months more in prison than the bacon flingers did and that’s a Muslim who had committed a set of appalling and violent crimes on a woman. I defy anyone to look at the comparative sentences given out to these Muslim savages and the bacon flingers and honestly say that they were proportionate. They are not.
Then we have the almost countless cases of Muslims fomenting violence against others. This is also never ever dealt with in an effective manner by the authorities. Muslim clerics can spout all manner of violent hatred and incitement to violence against gays, Jews, women but are left alone. If non-Muslims spouted stuff that was even a fraction as violence and sedition inciting as the Muslims do then we would be looking at a sentence of at least two years or more. When it comes to incitement to murder there seems to be one rule for us and quite another more lenient rule for the Islamic savages. We can see time and time again examples of how how Muslims get a slap on the wrist style sentences for the crimes that would have others doing much more serious jail time. This sort of thing is the very opposite of the idea of equal and fair justice.
The case of the bacon flingers and the way it has been disposed of shows that our politicians, especially our politicians of the Left, have created a legal system that seems to owe more to George Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’ than it does to Magna Carta or the 1689 Bill of Rights. In Britain today we have a situation where some animals, especially if their name is ‘Mohammed’ or ‘Abdul’ are plainly more equal than others.
Here’s the Evening Standard coverage of this story. As is usual policy for this blog the original text is in italics whereas this blog’s comments are in plain text.
The Evening Standard said:
Two men who hurled abuse and pelted a worshipper with rashers of bacon at a mosque in north London were jailed today.
There are many who would argue that jail is an inappropriate way of disposing of this case as this is the sort of offence that if the ‘victim’ had been anyone other than a Muslim, then it would probably have warranted a non-custodial or community sentence. Looks like this is the ugly Islamic legal double standard rearing its head here.
Mateusz Pawlikowski, 22, and Piotr Czak-Zukowski, 28, both Polish nationals, threw the meat inside the Al-Rahman Mosque in Camden as worshippers got ready for evening prayers.
The pair, who hurled expletives at one man before throwing rashers of bacon at him and onto the floor at his feet, were each sentenced to eight months in prison at Blackfriars Crown Court today.
The court heard how distressed worshippers immediately alerted police to the incident, which happened at about 7pm on October 2.
Of course the police immediately responded to a bunch of whining ‘offended’ Muslims. In fact they probably responded far quicker than to a burglary or other crime after all ticking the ‘diversity’ or ‘hate crime’ box is a higher priority for senior officers than anything else. I don’t blame the defendants for hurling abuse at the Muslims. I often feel like doing so myself, especially when they’ve raped our children again or killed British holidaymakers or blown up some public transport. It’s odd isn’t it how an ideology so steeped in rape and murder as Islam is attracts so much opprobrium from ordinary people.
Pawlikowski and Czak-Zukowski fled the scene but officers tracked them down and arrested them that afternoon.
That was seriously fast work by the police. Far faster than they can catch a burglar or a rapist or a murderer.
When officers searched Czak-Zukowski they found an empty packet of bacon in his pocket.
Pawlikowski and Czak-Zukowski, both from north London, each pleaded guilty to one count of criminal damage and a racial/religious public order offence at an earlier hearing at Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court.
It appears that there has been no credit given to the defendants for pleading guilty and saving the State the expense and inconvenience of a trial. Giving lesser sentences for pleading guilty, especially for minor crimes, has been a long standing custom in the British criminal legal system. However in this case this custom does not seem to have been observed and instead we see a legal system that is becoming the political instrument of those whom I call ‘Islamopanderers’. The State has decided to make an example of two men both in order to appease Muslims (and stop them rioting of course) and to frighten people into silence when it comes to the matter of Islam in Britain.
They were remanded in custody until their sentencing over fears for their safety if they were bailed.
This in itself is an admission by the police and the courts that the police can’t guarantee the safety of non Muslims in London. Just think about that for a second and about what it means. It means for one thing that we can’t trust the police, most notably the police in London, to protect citizens from Muslim violence or Muslim predation. It’s a counterproductive admission as it will fuel those who believe that there is no point in dealing with the police when it comes to criminal Muslims and who will instead ‘tool up’ and deal with the errant Muslims themselves. This is something that I’ve previously warned about and counselled against. Statements and actions like these do not reduce tension but instead heighten it.
Speaking after the sentencing, DC Tracey McMath, from the Camden community safety unit, said: “The defendants showed a complete disregard for the faith and belief of others in this callous and highly offensive incident; and I hope their convictions highlight that we will not tolerate hate crime in any of its forms.
What a disgusting example of an appeasing police officer is DC McMath. Firstly why should Islam be respected? Secondly why, unless there is actual violence of course, is the defendants attitude or opinion of Islam a matter for the police?
“I know this incident has had a significant impact on the community and commend the victims for speaking up.
What utter shite comes from this officers gob. It was a minor incident that didn’t have a ‘significant impact’ unlike the massive number of Muslim rapes that go on in the UK, now they do have a corrosive and significant impact on communities. Unfortunately the police don’t seem to want to look too closely at such problems. The ‘victims’ also didn’t need praise for ‘speaking up’. All they did was phone the police who came round in double quick time and even cleaned the bacon up from the mosque.
“Hate crime is often a hidden crime and it is essential we stand together with policing partners, colleagues and groups to investigate all such allegations, support victims and bring perpetrators to justice.”
What about the hate crime that comes from Muslims? What about the Jews who cannot walk down the street in peace because of Muslims? What about the gays driven out of the East End of London by Muslims? What about the thousands of young girls victimised by Muslim Rape Gangs or the violent sedition that is promulgated in Britain’s mosques? These are the real hate crimes, not some drunk who flings a bit of bacon about. The difference is that hate crimes perpetrated by Muslims are the real hidden hate crimes and they are hidden because both the police and politicians desire them to be hidden.
This case encompasses both procedural, investigative and sentencing injustice. The way it was treated throughout its journey through the legal system screams ‘appease Islam’. I hope that someone somewhere is collecting funds for these two victims of a politically biased legal system so that they can appeal their sentences.
This case will open up the eyes of many to some of the problems with pro-Islam bias and subjective opinion being treated as evidence that exist in our courts today. I believe that many will look back on this case and note it as the point when they utterly and completely ceased to trust either the police to investigate all crime without fear or favour and the point where the courts became a political instrument for the benefit of the Left, those enamoured of the ideology of multiculturalism and of the followers of an ideology that hates us the British people and all we stand for.
Men jailed for 8 months for flinging bacon
Muslim Koran teacher spared jail for sexual assaulted
Muslim savage given lenient sentence for beating up an torturing his girlfriend
Other stories from Fahrenheit 211 about the bacon flingers of Camden
Police abased themselves before the Muslims by acting as cleaners at the mosque picking up the thrown bacon.
Fun stuff ‘The MK V ‘Bacon Drone’ for when you really really need to fling bacon but don’t want to be caught