From Elsewhere: America needs to talk honestly about Islam.

Islam is a wolf in sheeps clothing and it is high time that we started to notice the wolf rather than being distracted by the sheep.

 

A very interesting piece from the National Review magazine website. In it the author, David French, writing in the aftermath of recent Islamic attacks in New York, New Jersey and Minnesota states that American’s need to wake up to the true nature of Islam. It may be comforting for many to assume that the problems with Islamic terror or Islamic crime are the work of a tiny minority of extremists, but it’s not. The problems with Islam go way beyond that which could be explained away as being merely the result of a tiny minority of extremists. This is a very thought provoking piece and shows just why Islam is ‘different’ and not in a nice way from other religious or religio-political paths.

The National Review said:

Here is a plain, inarguable truth: A series of Muslim immigrants and “visitors” are responsible for killing more Americans on American soil than the combined militaries of Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany. Two more attacks over the weekend left 38 Americans wounded, and it appears that both were carried out by Muslim immigrants.

In Saint Cloud, Minn., Dahir Adan’s family identified him as the man who stabbed eight people in a mall before being shot and killed by an armed civilian, an off-duty police officer named Jason Falconer. Adan’s family said he was born in Kenya. In New York, police arrested an Aghan-American named Ahmad Khan Rahami after a shootout. He’s a “person of interest” in bombings in both New York and New Jersey that injured 29.

Despite making up a tiny fraction of the American population, Muslims are responsible for exponentially more terror deaths than any other meaningful American community. Even if you use the Left’s utterly ridiculous standard of “terror deaths since 9/11” (why exclude America’s worst terror attack when calculating the terror threat?), Muslim terrorists have killed almost twice as many people as every other American faction or demographic combined. Yet when any politician or pundit suggests restrictions or even special scrutiny applied to Muslim immigrants — especially Muslim immigrants or visitors from jihadist conflict zones — entire sectors of the Left (and some on the right) recoil in shock and horror. Whenever there’s a terror attack, there’s an almost palpable desperation to determine that the attacker was not Muslim and the attack had “no connection” to international terror, in spite of the fact that it is now ISIS and al-Qaeda strategy to inspire lone wolves.

The simple explanation for this desperation is that there’s a fear that any terror attack helps Donald Trump win the presidency. But the desperation long predated Trump’s rise. It’s a desperation born out of the realization that facing actual facts about the Islamic world threatens an entire, absurd ideology of “diversity” that views different cultures (except of course for the hated Christian oppressor) as the equivalent of Neapolitan ice cream — each flavor and color has a distinct taste, but it’s all still sugary goodness.

The reality is different. The Muslim world has a severe problem with anti-Semitism, intolerance, and terrorism. As I’ve documented before, using data from Pew Foundation surveys, it’s plain that more than 100 million Muslims have expressed sympathy for terrorists such as Osama bin Laden or for barbaric jihadist groups such as ISIS. Hundreds of millions more express support for the most intolerant forms of sharia law. Telethons in Saudi Arabia have raised vast sums of money for terrorist causes, and jihadists have been able to recruit hundreds of thousands of fighters to deploy against Americans, Israelis, and our Muslim allies. Given these facts, why is it bigoted to propose plainly constitutional ideological litmus tests? How is it bigoted to halt — absent compelling extenuating circumstances — immigration from jihadist conflict zones or jihadist-dominated regions? We have implemented ideological tests before, during the Cold War, when there was an active national-security threat. We should do so again.

Read the rest of this excellent piece here:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/440175/chelsea-bombing-minnesota-stabbing-jihadist-threat-america-grows
The author is correct we do need to realise the truth about Islam and that truth is that Islam is unlike almost any other belief system. It’s grossly violent, misogynistic and filled with burning hatred for anyone or anything that is classified under Islam as ‘not Muslim.’ We should no longer see Islam as one of a number of religions that in a broadly secular society can peacefully coexist with one another, but more as a threat to open and tolerant societies.