Why were these ‘exclusion orders’ not used extensively before the Manchester atrocity Ms Rudd?

The terminally useless Amber Rudd (picture from Spectator magazine)

 

In the annals of modern British political history, Amber Rudd will go down as probably one of th worst Home Secretary’s that Britain has ever had. If Britain survives as a nation and as a people, then Rudd, like Theresa May, who did zero to protect the citizen from Islamic threat or Roy Jenkins whose uber-liberal policies had massive unforeseen negative effects on British culture, will be a figure of mockery and scorn.

How else can you view, but with scorn and disgust, a Home Secretary who since she came into office has done very little to exclude dangerous Muslims from the United Kingdom? Since Ms Rudd became Home Secretary when Theresa May became Prime Minister we in Britain have been subjected to terror attacks by Muslims in Britain. We are also at risk of further terror attacks and even more Islam-related crime because Ms Rudd’s department has not even used the terrorist exclusion legislation to keep these violent savages out of the country.

It is only now, as justifiable and burning anger is rising about the Islamic savage who killed 22 people in the Manchester Arena, that Ms Rudd has decided that dangerous Muslim terrorist savages should be excluded from the United Kingdom. This begs the question what on earth has the Home Office been doing about these violent Islamic savages in the time running up to the Manchester Islamic atrocity? Have Ms Rudd and her staff been sitting on their arses paralysed by political correctness as Islamic savages kill, maim and rape? It certainly seems like it.

According to the Guardian Newspaper Ms Rudd talked the talk about dealing harshly with jihadists but if she is judged by her previous record and that of her boss when she was Home Secretary then these words are utterly empty.

The Guardian newspaper said:

Suspected Islamist terrorists are being prevented from returning to the UK for the first time, the home secretary has disclosed, as she warned that members of the Manchester bomber’s terror network could still be at large.

As questions continue over how the intelligence services failed to monitor the movements of attacker Salman Abedi, Amber Rudd refused to rule out further anti-terror laws to clamp down on suspected jihadis.

Temporary exclusion orders make it unlawful for the subject to come back without engaging with UK authorities. Rudd refused to say how many times they had been used, but confirmed: “We have started to use them.”

The home secretary also admitted the authorities did not know how many Britons had returned from fighting with Islamic State or other extremists in Syria.

Abedi is reported to have travelled to Libya in 2011 during the school holidays to join his father, Ramadan, in the fight against Muammar Gaddafi. It has also been suggested Abedi “most likely” went to Syria but Turkish officials reportedly said they had no record of him travelling to the country.

Asked to comment on reports that the security services missed opportunities to monitor Abedi, Rudd said: “I wouldn’t rush to conclusions, as you seem to be, that they have missed.”

Pressed on whether Abedi was “red-flagged” to the security services and if there could be a review of current procedures, Rudd said: “We won’t shy away from looking at what we can do to keep people safe. We are in constant discussion with the security services and the police to make sure they have the right tools they need.”

Rudd also said “potentially” other members of Abedi’s group could still be free and “we can’t be entirely sure that [the operation] is closed”.

Read the rest of this Guardian piece via the link below:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/28/members-of-manchester-bomber-network-may-still-be-at-large-amber-rudd

Despite Ms Rudd’s protestations that ‘something will be done’ about the problem of Islamic savagery I doubt that it will. She doesn’t have the metaphorical ‘balls’ to face down the Human Rights whiners or the politically correct types or the permanently ‘offended’ Muslims or various Islamic grievance mongers. Amber Rudd is a weak politician easily manipulated by lobbyists and politically correct whiners and is not of the political stature needed for this great office of state. Her previous postings have been in that haven of scientific fakery the Department of Energy and Climate change and as a junior minister at that same department and in the Treasury. It says a lot about the dearth of political talent available to Mrs Theresa May, that this useless, incompetent and utterly weak politician, was seen as a fit and proper person to guard over our security, our safety or our borders.

1 Comment on "Why were these ‘exclusion orders’ not used extensively before the Manchester atrocity Ms Rudd?"

  1. They’ll do everything possible to keep us safe (as long as it doesn’t increase the risk of them being called racist, Islamophobic, or “the nasty party”).

    They come across like a footballer before a game saying “I’m gonna go out there and give it 80%”.

Comments are closed.