Video – Tim Burton talks about contempt of court and allegations of wrongdoing by the Crown Prosecution Service

 

Below is a video from Tim Burton the counterjihad writer who was gaoled for 12 weeks earlier this year for ‘religiously harassing’ the mendacious grievance mongering Islamic taqiyya artist Fiyaz Mughal, the founder of the Tell Mama group. The Burton case, was one which appeared to have been given undue attention by the Crown Prosecution service, allegedly because of Fiyaz Mughal’s connections with the CPS as an advisor on ‘Islamophobia’.

It’s interesting to compare the speed and efficiency with which the CPS brought Mr Burton to court for merely putting in a joke job application to the Tell Mama organisation and engaging in some email banter with them, with the tortoise-like way the CPS moves in cases where there are no high profile Muslims like Mughal involved. To give one example the CPS drags their feet in the case of Chelsey Wright who alleges that she was raped by a gang of Muslims in Sunderland, but pulls out the stops in order to benefit Fiyaz Mughal. Because of these and other instances where the CPS has appeared to have a double standard that favours Muslims and Muslim complainants, there are many who are now saying that the noisome smell of political corruption is beginning to emanate from the CPS. The allegations of Islamic groups and individuals having undue influence on CPS policies has done nothing to dispel the ongoing worries about the probity and honesty of CPS staff and management and of trials being brought purely for political rather than criminal reasons.

The group that Mr Burton mentions having CPS staff as one of their patrons is the Curriculum for Cohesion group which was formed by a man who acted as prosecution expert witness in the Burton case, Dr Matthew Wilkinson a convert to Islam and a well connected academic currently at London’s School of Oriental and African Studies. This blog has published an extensive article on the worrying influence that Curriculum for Cohesion has had on the training of judges, teachers and senior civil servants. Curriculum for Cohesion are an organisation that pushes Islam into areas of government that many non Muslim Britons would be unhappy to see Islam have any influence over.

Dr Wilkinson was brought in to the Burton trial by the CPS in order to give a definition of ‘taqiyya’ or the idea that Muslims can lie to protect Islam. However, at no point did Dr Wilkinson declare to the court that his Curriculum for Cohesion group had as one of its patrons a senior prosecutor from the Crown Prosecution Service. This is looking to some as if it could be a conflict of interest and something that should have been declared to the jury in the Burton case. Here’s this blog’s piece on Dr Matthew Wilkinson and his Curriculum for Cohesion group.

https://www.fahrenheit211.net/2017/07/27/the-islamic-academic-organisation-that-is-pushing-islam-unbidden-and-unwanted-by-the-populace-into-our-public-life/

I urge people to support Mr Burton’s legal fight to highlight both the procedural inconsistencies surrounding his original trial, of which there were quite a few and the alleged probity and impartiality issues that may be affecting the Crown Prosecution Service.

2 Comments on "Video – Tim Burton talks about contempt of court and allegations of wrongdoing by the Crown Prosecution Service"

  1. Timothy Burton | August 22, 2017 at 8:47 am |

    Wouldn’t it be interesting if someone researched all the recent high-profile cases where Dr Matthew Wilkinson gave expert witness evidence on behalf of the CPS without declaring the conflict of interest inherent in having a senior CPS official as a patron of his organisation…… And also, wouldn’t it be interesting if the defence counsel in those very same high-profile cases got to hear about this conflict of interest concerning the expert evidence that helped to get their clients convicted……

    • Fahrenheit211 | August 22, 2017 at 9:58 am |

      It would indeed be interesting and might cause some quite nasty Islamic terrorists to bring appeals against convictions in those cases where Dr Wilkinson may have had a part to play in the conviction and where Dr Wilkinson may also not have declared links between his organisation and CPS staff.

Comments are closed.