‘Rapeugees’ put in building next to a school, courtesy of the Labour Party, the luvvies and the bleeding heart brigade.

Overfields Primary School Middlesbrough pic from Daily Mirror

 

If you want to know just how little respect or care that the modern Labour Party has for the ordinary person in this country then this story from Middlesbrough may give you some idea. It is a classic example of the contempt that the Labour Party, the Leftist Establishment and the fools of the ‘refugees welcome’ movement have for the rest of us.

Parents at a school in Middlesbrough were horrified and concerned when a coach pulled up whilst they were collecting their children from school and disgorged a whole load of people from some of the most violent, hate filled, misogynistic and paedo-friendly cultures in the world and dumped them in a building next to the school. What had happened is that without informing either the school, the parents or even it seems the residents nearby, the council had turned a redundant building next to the school as a ‘refugee welcome’ centre.

Just think for a moment just how great is the arrogance on the part of the council and the bleeding heart social justice warriors has been shown by their actions. They take people in from Islamic cultures, and who may not even be Syrians fleeing war, and whose ideology is a clear and present danger to us and our children, and place them next to a school without thought for the people who may be adversely affected by this. Those who’ve planned this imposition of ‘rape-ugees’ clearly don’t give a toss about the local people whose lives will be blighted by this. They obviously don’t care that these people come from cultures where violence is a way of life, where women are treated as property and where paedophilia is not so much a crime but, because Mohammed did it, something to be emulated.

It seems that the British government and British local councils, in this case a Labour one, are starting to emulate the German government’s policy of dumping these people on unsuspecting communities without warning. This is because there was great and as we’ve since learned justifiable hostility to these rape-ugees being housed in these communities. Many of these ‘refugees’ have caused such great problems for German communities, that they have made themselves unwanted. Too often they behaved in a manner more suited to a zoo than a civilised country, so the ‘refugees’ were in future, bussed in secretly. This is what appears to have happened in Middlesbrough.

Here’s how Britain’s Daily Express covered this story and the horror of the parents finding that rape-ugees were being catered for in a building next door to their children’s school. In a piece entitled ‘We were told nothing about it’, the Express told of how a deceitful council has gone out of its way to hide the arrival and future locations of these ‘rape-ugees’. As is usual policy for this blog the original text is in italics and this blog’s comments are in plain text.

The Daily Express said:

PARENTS were left stunned when a bus jam-packed with Syrian refugees arrived unannounced at their children’s school.

I bet the parents were stunned. There they were picking up their kids from what they thought was a safe school environment only to see a taxpayer paid for coach disgorging people from the sort of cultures we should be protecting our children from.

It was only because they saw the bus arrive that they became aware a building within the grounds of Overfields primary school in Middlesbrough had been transformed into a refugee welcome centre.

How many other coaches full of unwanted ‘Syrian’ ‘Rape-ugees’ have got through to unsuspecting British communities where they have not been spotted like this? It was only luck that the locals saw this coach and started to find out what fresh hell their Labour-run council had got in store for them.

The packed bus arrived on Tuesday afternoon as pupils were being collected from the school and the refugees were whisked into the vacant building owned by Redcar and Cleveland Council.

The council kept this very quiet and seem to have been planning this imposition secretly for a while. It makes me wonder just what could possibly be wrong with these ‘rape-ugees’ that made the council so secretive.

It came just hours after the Labour-run authority approved plans to allow 125 Syrian refugees a year to move into the area.

I bet the Labour party in the area were all in favour of this move. Labour have become the party that more often than not puts the needs of foreigners, Islamic paedophiles, criminals, and illegals way, way above the needs or desires or even the security and safety of local British people.

The council confirmed the families were being “greeted” at the centre but were unable to confirm whether they represented the first Syrian refugees to arrive on Teesside. 

Seems to be a lot of unnecessary secrecy surrounding these allegedly ‘deserving’ and well-vetted ‘refugees’ isn’t there? It’s almost as if the council and the do-gooders know something about these ‘refugees’ that they’d rather the rest of us not find out.

A Redcar and Cleveland spokesman said: “The refugees were attending a welcome event, which included an introduction to the area, before being taken to their homes.”

Alison Ker, who is working at the site, said: “It is just a registration centre, they will be leaving tonight.”

It’s good that these people, who are likely to be from Islamic cultures that have a less than condemnatory attitude to child-sex,are leaving the site and not being housed there, but the question is why wasn’t anybody, even the school, informed about what was happening? If even the headteacher is in the dark about what was planned but the council had a worker on site who could have told them, then this looks even more murky and suspicious.

She added that the refugees had “just flown” into the UK but declined to give details over where they would be permanently based.

Again, why the unjustifiable secrecy? If these people really are genuine refugees grateful for the help that the British taxpayer is giving them and people who have passed the best possible vetting, then why not be more honest? This is very odd. Publicising these allegedly deserving ‘refugees’ could have been an absolute boon for a refugees welcome movement that has depended on extreme emotionalist images to fuel their narrative of the ‘poor helpless refugees’ that they’ve been a part of. The ‘refugees welcome’ movement has not baulked at using pictures of dead toddlers on beaches, so surely they would have had no ethical problem with photographing grateful people snatched from the jaws of death getting off of coaches in Middlesbrough? I recall that the media did similar stories about grateful refugees in the past when there were actually grateful refugees in the form of the Vietnamese Boat People and the Ugandan Asians. Why not in this case? If anything it’s the sort of thing that could help the ‘refugees welcome’ cause as did publicity about the plight of the Boat People. This case, and the secrecy surrounding it really doesn’t smell really any good at all.

Parents told of their shock at the school gates as the bus arrived while they were picking up their children.

I bet they were shocked. One minute they think that they and their kids are safe and secure and the next they know a building on the site is being used to welcome who knows who or what.

One said: “My kids attend Overfields Primary School and within school grounds there is an unused building. As we picked our kids up you could imagine our surprise when we saw the full bus. 

I can well imagine that there was also a fair bit of anger about this move and the secrecy surrounding it. Despite much mainstream media censorship there are a growing number of Britons who know what these ‘refugees’ have done in Germany, Sweden and elsewhere. They now know of the rapes, the sexual assaults, the violence, the targeting of teenage girls and boys for abuse and the squalor that these ‘refugees’ have brought to these once peaceful and cohesive nations.

“I’ve tried contacting the school headmistress and council but nothing has been said.”

Another added: “We were told nothing about it, and wouldn’t know anything now had parents not been around when the bus arrived.

It was only by chance that the parents spotted what was going on and it makes me wonder what else the council has got away with or will get away with in future that has not been seen as publicly as this?

We have no idea who these people are and there are obviously some safety worries having them located within school grounds.”

Of course there are safety worries, just look at the sort of shitheap of a culture that these people have come from. To ‘welcome’ them in a building on school grounds is foolishness and arrogance beyond belief. The group leader at my child’s playgroup has to pass vigorous vetting and checking before he is even allowed to enter the room when the children are there. In Middlesbrough, and for these ‘Syrians’ it seems that different rules apply. They can be de-coached unchecked and unvetted in school property even they come from cultures that can fairly be described as ‘rape culture central’.

Overfields headteacher Tracy Watson admitted she was as much in the dark about the arrival as parents.

This is really, really strange. Here you have a building on or very close to school property, which is going to be used for a non-school purpose and the headteacher has not been informed. You’d think that the head would be the first to be told what was happening, if only to defuse any problems or be aware for health and safety reasons that there were going to be extra people on the site. Although it may be something that the school is involved in you’d think wouldn’t you that protocol and politeness would cause the school to keep the head in the loop.

She said: “It is not anything to do with the school.

We share the site in question with different providers, one of whom is Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council.”

She added: “I probably know as much as you at this point.”

This as I’ve said before is an outrageous level of unnecessary secrecy. What’s wrong with these ‘Syrians’ that they have to be hidden in this way?

Under the newly-approved council proposal, refugees will be offered services, including housing and welfare, when they arrive.

If they are that desperate to escape a war zone then why are the not kept in camps in Britain where they can be more effectively retrained and resettled and not be yet another imported burden on our welfare services and housing stock? If I was fleeing from a war-zone I wouldn’t expect my new host country to provide a house. A bed in a safe former army camp with food and medical care would be more than acceptable. Come to think of it if this country went tits up and my family had to flee then I’d sure as damnit make sure that my wife and my child were on the boat or the plane first. This doesn’t seem to be the case with these ‘Syrians’, most of whom are Muslim men of military age, the very last people any civilised country should be allowing to cross their borders. Where’s the women and children seems to be a valid question to ask?

It is part of the Syrian Resettlement Programme, which aims to resettle 20,000 refugees from war-torn Syria across the UK during this current Parliament.

If even 10% of these ‘Syrians’ are as ‘rapey’ as the ones that Germany and other European nations have had to deal with then I’d say that the people of Redcar and Cleveland and elsewhere are going to be in for a pretty frightening and dangerous time.

Last September, political leaders set out plans to offer homes to up to 500 refugee families across Teesside.

Regarding approval of the Syrian proposals, Redcar and Cleveland Council’s Lynn Pallister, cabinet member for health and housing, said: “The council are planning to resettle families who have fled from the civil war in Syria, with a commitment to take around 25 families per year for the next five years.

It’s strange isn’t it that Labour councils up and down the country, including this one, have spent the last six years whining as loudly as they can about ‘vicious toreee cutz’, yet they can suddenly find cash, housing and other support for these alleged ‘refugees’? It makes me wonder if they were telling the truth about these ‘cuts’. It also makes me wonder what services to British people, many of whom have had a lifetime of paying into the tax and national insurance system, Redcar and Cleveland Council will cut to pay for this bit of virtue signalling? Maybe the council will cut old people’s centres and services or support for other people who may be deserving and have a call on our collective help.

Late last year in November 2015, in an article that I wrote about the situation regarding the ‘refugees’ in Germany, I made the prediction that British councils would copy the policy of dumping these ‘Syrians’ on unsuspecting towns, cities and small communities. I said in a post entitled ‘Beware the unmarked coaches’:

“Tomorrow the brown stuff will truly start to be chucked at the fan by our government with all the gusto of a frustrated incontinent chimp. From tomorrow many British towns and cities may start to experience some of what German citizens have been going through. In that country local people not just in the big cities but in small towns and villages, have been completely gob smacked by having thousands of demanding, violent, criminal, hate-filled and often rape-happy ‘Syrian’ ‘refugees’. Coaches have pulled up and disgorged hundreds of angry, violent ‘refugees’ on unsuspecting locals, including in one case where the German village of Sumte in Lower Saxony, a place with a population of only 102, was told it would have to accept 750 snarling, violent, aggressive ‘refugees’. With behaviour like this by the German government some German citizens must be starting to be worried when they see groups of coaches roaring into their towns at night, just in case it’s the government dumping ‘refugees’ on their town.

It’s likely that the British government could try to do something similar with the ‘Syrian’ ‘refugees’ that are being allowed in to the UK. My cynical side says that I would not put it past the government dump these ‘Syrian’ ‘refugees’ on market, county and rural towns and cities, and do it on the quiet.

If the pattern goes anything like what has happened elsewhere in Europe, there will be many Britons who won’t know that ‘Syrian’ ‘refugees’ have been dumped on them, until the town centre is full of them bumming around doing nothing but being antisocial, or they start making outrageous demands, start mumbling about Jihad, or the local rape and sex crime figures go up, whichever comes the sooner. I’d say look at the experience of the Germans in this and beware the buses arriving in the dead of night in order to deliver their dangerous and unwanted ambulant cargo. You might think that you live in a safe or safer town or city but how long do you think it will stay relatively safe once these alleged ‘Syrians’ start to make their presence felt?

Sadly, it seems that my prediction was at least partially correct and Redcar and Cleveland Council seem to have taken the ‘German’ option here. What’s worse is that their arrogance is so overwhelming that they have not even had the decency to keep the headteacher or local residents, informed of this particular imposition.

People need to be aware of this tactic by councils of dumping these ‘Syrians’ on communities that often don’t want them (for good reasons I might add) and which will in no way by enhanced by their presence.

Links

Original story from the Daily Express

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/673823/Parents-stunned-as-bus-full-of-REFUGEES-arrives-at-school

The German method of dumping destructive violent ‘refugees’ on small unsuspecting communities and why we should be wary of the coaches that come in the night.

https://www.fahrenheit211.net/2015/11/16/syrian-refugees-start-arriving-in-the-uk-tomorrow-beware-the-unmarked-coaches-that-could-be-arriving-in-your-town/