Beheading Attack. Does Woolwich Mosque have questions to answer?

Woolwich Mosque

 

There is a very disturbing story in today’s Daily Telegraph told by the mother of one of the Woolwich beheading suspects, Michael Adebowale, which raises questions regarding his contacts with Woolwich Mosque and also how they dealt with him if he had indeed attended.

It appears that Adebowale’s mother, Mrs Juliet Obasuyi, a 43-year-old probation officer and a practising Christian was extremely concerned about her sons conversion to Islam and his activities once he became a Muslim.

Adebowale became increasingly radical in his views and in desperation she allegedly sent her son along to Woolwich Mosque for what she hoped was instruction on how to live as a peaceful law abiding Muslim.

The Telegraph said:

His mother was advised by a neighbour to take him to the head of the Woolwich mosque for spiritual guidance. He was converted to Islam by the head Imam, and taken for weeks of “further training” at a centre near Cambridge.

When he returned, however, he was even more “radicalised” and his mother could no longer “get through to him”. A spokesman for the mosque said they did not know if he attended or been converted there”

This is an interesting development. A man’s mother, concerned about radicalisation, takes her son to the very mosque that made an emotional public declaration of peace and shock at the attack in Woolwich. He is then sent by the mosque to an Islamic centre near Cambridge, presumably one that is known to, or is associated with this mosque for de-radicalisation but comes back much worse.

Woolwich Mosque now have questions to answer about their involvement in this case. It may be that the Imams of Woolwich mosque are completely innocent, and that Adebowale would have been a murdering nutter anyway whatever mosque he went to. However it appears that there is the possibility that staff at Woolwich Mosque may have known of Adebowale’s propensity for religious violence but did not inform the appropriate authorities and instead sent him for ‘Islamic training’ that is alleged to have made him worse.

The Woolwich Mosque has, according to the Daily Telegraph, denied knowledge of Adebowale’s attendance at their Masjid or of having records of his conversion to Islam. It may be that he converted elsewhere, Lewisham has been mentioned, but someone, somewhere must have a record of Adebowale’s public recitation of the declaration of Islamic faith as required by Islamic Law.

The questions that need to be answered by Woolwich mosque are:

Did the attacker convert or reconvert at Woolwich?

Which Islamic centre near Cambridge was he sent to?

Was the Cambridge Centre one of those which have been pumped full of Saudi money? How much did Woolwich Mosque know about Adebowale’s radical views and what procedures did they undertake to try to soften them?

If they did know about his radicalism why didn’t they contact the Police or the Security Service?

Could this attack have been prevented if Woolwich Mosque (provided that Adebowale really did attend there) had notified either the security agencies or the Community Psychiatric Service?

I don’t want to think that Woolwich Mosque are being economical with the truth on this matter, but the Telegraph article does require us to ask questions about who Adebowale had contact with in the South East London Islamic Community.

Readers should feel some sympathy for this offender’s Mother, it seems she tried to do all she could to prevent her son from following the ideology of Islam and also from embracing Islam’s violent side. No responsible parent wants their child to grow up to be a criminal or a killer but this is what has happened to Mrs Obasuyi, despite what seems like heroic attempts to drag her son back from the brink.

Link

Daily Telegraph interview with attackers Mother

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10079781/Woolwich-attack-Michael-Adebowales-mother-tried-to-prevent-radicalisation.html

 

A Turning Point?

Picture from Granada. Graffiti attack on a mosque in Bolton

The reports filtering through both the mainstream media and from personal contacts appear to show that the murder of Drummer Rigby could be a turning point in not only attitudes to Islam but also in how willing people are to speak up and speak out. Unfortunately not everyone is speaking about the issues peacefully. There are reports of attacks on mosques, insults and attacks on Muslims in the street, and attacks on Muslim run restaurants and fast food establishments, many of which are coming to light as people are charged.

The police also appear to be starting to panic and are trying to head off public disorder by arresting those who may or may not be inciting violence and who post their views online and on various social networks. These ‘intimidation arrests’ by the police are probably intended to try to prevent the spread of criticism of Islam and to prevent individuals who may be antagonistic to Islam from linking up as well as to prevent public disorder.  Such a phenomenon of generalised coherent counter-jihadist activity and speech would be the a disaster for both the Police and the multikulti supporting politicians who have spent the last decade or more promoting political correctness and multiculturalism, and suppressing criticism of such ideologies, even when the criticism was valid and non-racist.

As regular readers may well know, I don’t approve of violence against individuals or property as it is often counterproductive as well as being wrong and illegal. The murder in Woolwich by, and lets call them by their proper name, Muslims, has shocked people so much that the often justified but suppressed antagonism many feel towards Islam is now being expressed. In the past fear of being called ‘racist’ has held people back from commenting on the sort of problems that organised Islam has brought to the UK and this fear of accusation has muted criticism of Islam. However, the brutal killing of a serving solider on the streets of the Capital, coming as it does in the wake of revelations of the existence of a substantial number of Islamic Grooming Gangs, has angered people and this anger is now coming out, but not always in appropriate ways. It could be said that this murder has been the final straw for many people.

The stresses that British society has been put under by the effects of the doctrines of multiculturalism, and excessive and inappropriate immigration are phenomenal, with pressure on schools, services, welfare systems, jobs and transport. Couple this with the fact that too many immigrants to the UK do not respect the country and culture or abide by its laws, and in the case of some of our Islamic ghettos, are actively hostile to the UK and its culture, then you have a formula for violence and disaster.

I do hope that Enoch Powell’s prediction of Rivers of Blood do NOT come true, but if it does then the fault will lie ultimately with those politicians who have attempted to turn a relatively homogenous island nation into a Balkanised ‘pressure cooker’. The enemy is not the brainwashed, oppressed Muslim woman in a hijab, but the idiot politicians, who believed that advanced and backward cultures were equal who have caused this problem. It is this enemy that needs to be removed from their comfy sinecures where they have lorded over us and lied to us for far to long.

Don’t riot, vote! Voting out the politicos who have both caused the problems and denied the existence of cultural compatibility issues regarding Islam, would be a better long term solution to our problems than mobs with flaming torches gathering outside Mosques. Intelligent Islamo-scepticism from both the Government and people is what is needed, not violence.  It would be better for counterjihadists to chuck the useless and sometimes treasonous politicos out of a job, than to spend the next few years counting the bricks in the wall of a cell.

Links

Daily Telegraph article on reprisals for attack in Woolwich

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10080300/Woolwich-attack-provokes-anti-Muslim-backlash-across-UK.html

For your information here is the Telegraph’s reprinting of Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643823/Enoch-Powells-Rivers-of-Blood-speech.html

Priorities! Let’s arrest the 85 year olds

Picture shows two of Kents ‘finest’ searching the North Kent area for elderly women with illegal opinions. Please note these specially bred pigs are not suitable for finding Terrorists or Islamic Grooming Gangs, they are only suitable for tracking down and apprehending old women who don’t like Islam.

In Britain the Shariah patrol, sorry I mean Kent police, really showed where there priorities lie, by arresting and handcuffing an 85 year old woman who was protesting about the death of Drummer Rigby and about the problems of Islam in general.

The US news source, Front Page Magazine said:

“Priorities, priorities. Witnesses claim it took London police 20 minutes to show up and stop the two Muslim killers.  The official police narrative is something like 9 minutes for the unarmed police and 14 minutes for the armed police (those crazy Americans with their guns everywhere, really.)

But when it comes to something truly serious, like protecting Muslims from elderly British women, then the coppers were on the case.

“An 85-year-old woman has this afternoon been arrested after abuse was hurled at Muslims outside Gillingham Mosque. The pensioner was handcuffed and taken away in a van by officers attending the Canterbury Street mosque for Friday prayers. As worshippers gathered outside the venue, a woman at a nearby bus stop shouted: “go back to your own country”.

The arrested woman, from the Maidstone Road area of Chatham, was taken away by officers at about 1.45pm and is now in police custody. A Kent Police spokesman said: “An 85 year old woman from Chatham was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence.”

This woman survived WW2 and presumably learned all the wrong lessons about resisting fascism. But if she had been a Muslim beheading a British soldier, she could have just strolled away while the police took 20 minutes to come around.

And the same police that could not be bothered, when it came to protecting Muslims from angry Britons shouting things, then no expense was spared and no time wasted.

An extra 1,200 police officers were deployed on the streets of London after an impromptu English Defence League protest descended into violence in Woolwich, south-east London, following Wednesday’s terrorist attack.”

Front Page Magazine then mentioned the recent arrests for allegedly ‘offensive’ Tweets of two men from Bristol.  FPM said:

“In Bristol two men were detained following allegedly racist messages that appeared on Twitter following the terrorist murder. A spokesman for Avon and Somerset Police said two men aged 22 and 23 were being questioned over the incident.

He said: “The men were arrested under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred. They are currently in custody. Our enquiries into these comments continue.”

I did some digging on the web regarding this ‘offensive’ Tweet and cannot at this time find any sign of it.  All the British news outlets have the same blandly worded Police Press Release/Agency Report.   However the website UKUSAONLINE.COM reported that the tweet contained ‘inflammatory language’ and that there had been an attempt made in the social media conversation to organise a demonstration against Islam in Bristol.

Here is the full report from ukusaonline.com

Woolwich attacks: Two men arrested over ‘offensive Twitter comments about Lee Rigby’s death’

May 24, 2013 By Staff 0

 0 Google +0  0  0  0

  • A 23-year-old and a 22-year-old held under the Public Order Act
  • Sources say they were planning an anti-Muslim protest event in Bristol
  • Complaints made to Avon and Somerset Police about remarks on Twitter
  • Police say people should be careful about what they write on twitter as the ‘consequences could be serious’

By Jaymi Mccann

PUBLISHED: 03:24 EST, 24 May 2013 | UPDATED: 10:00 EST, 24 May 2013

Two men have been arrested for making alleged offensive comments on Twitter after the murder of a British soldier.

MailOnline understands the pair had tweeted using inflammatory language and were trying to organise an anti-Muslim protest in Bristol following the execution of Drummer Lee Rigby, 25, in Woolwich two days ago.

Complaints were made to Avon and Somerset Police about remarks that appeared on the social networking website, which were of a racist or anti-religious nature.

The force said today a 23-year-old and a 22-year-old, both from Bristol, were held under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred.

http://www.usaukonline.com/latest-news/13491-woolwich-attacks-two-men-arrested-over-offensive-twitter-comments-about-lee-rigby-s-death.html

Does anybody completely believe them? It’s up to you.

A list of Islamic organisations who have condemned the Woolwich attack has been published by Asian Image.  These condemnations contain some very fine words.

http://www.asianimage.co.uk/news/10438210.List_of_Muslim_groups_condemning_Woolwich_murder/?ref=mr

Fine words are all well and good but fine words about peace, human brotherhood and equality mean nothing if they are not backed by actions.  Sadly many of the actions we see associated with Islam have been violent ones, and this means there is a disconnect between the ‘face’ of Islam that the Imams and others are presenting and the reality as it is observed.

This disconnect between observed truth and the words of these personages is so severe that it leads me to not trust such statements of condemnaton, and believe them to be only soothing words with no real substance behind them.

I make this, quite harsh I admit, judgement not out of prejudice, but from the personal experience of being lied to by an Islamist organisation whilst working in a community organisation setting.  The outrageousness of the lies and excuses given to me was breathtaking, and an undertaking not to support exterminationist preachers was quickly breached.   This has sadly made me less inclined to trust statements by Islamic groups.

Whether you believe them is up to you.  I choose to be sceptical.

A tale of two aircraft incidents

The BA flight after its emergency landing at Heathrow

We appear to have had two airliner incidents today.

This one

http://news.sky.com/story/1095039/plane-on-fire-flying-over-central-london

The BA fire is probably due to a technical fault.  There doesn’t appear to be any Islamic involvement.

However, this story, of a plane diverted to Stanstead and escorted by RAF fighters for what have been called ‘security’ reasons’ probably does have some Islamic aspect to the tale.

http://news.sky.com/story/1095214/fighter-jets-scrambled-to-passenger-plane

 

Some ‘hate speech’ is more equal than others. It appears that the post-Woolwich ‘thought crime’ arrests have started.

Some ‘hate speech’ is more equal than others.

Note:  See ‘Addendum’ at the bottom of this piece.

Although details are at this point sketchy, it appears that the police have been uncharacteristically efficient when enforcing Labour’s ‘thought crime’ and ‘anti-religous hatred’ laws.

Sky News is reporting that two men have been arrested in Bristol for sending ‘offensive tweets’.  It is not known whether or not these guys are Islamic nutters glorying in the attack, those inciting mosque burnings or just reasonable people driven to anger by the antics of Islam.    However, because the arrest was made for ‘racial and religious hatred’ it may be safe to assume that these tweets were anti Islam.

The news outlet said:

“Avon and Somerset Police received complaints from members of the public about remarks that appeared on the social networking website, which were of a racist or anti-religious nature.

A 23-year-old and a 22-year-old, both from Bristol, were held under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred.

Detective Inspector Ed Yaxley said: “On Wednesday evening, we were contacted by people concerned about comments made on social media accounts.

“We began inquiries into the comments and at around 3.20am two men, aged 23 and 22, were detained at two addresses in Bristol.

“The men were arrested under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred. Our inquiries into these comments continue.

“These comments were directed against a section of our community. Comments such as these are completely unacceptable and only cause more harm to our community in Bristol.”

The actual content of the allegedly offending tweet is unknown me at this stage, but it appears that according to the Bristol Post and other sources, the comment appears to be of an anti-religious (probably anti-Muslim) nature. It is not known whether this ‘offensive’ tweet was directly inciting violence eg a call for mosques to be burned, or whether it was just harsh and quite justifiable criticism of Islam? If anyone can supply me with a copy of the tweet I would be interested to see it and may reproduce it, provided of course, that the ‘offending’ tweet is NOT inciting violence. The content of the tweet is a black hole according to the various bits of the MSM I’ve seen that have covered this story.

As far as I’m concerned, harsh criticism, ridicule, and debunking of the ideology of Islam, and campaigning for politicians to take their heads out of their arses and deal with Britain’s Islamic problem, is acceptable. Calls for violence however, as I’ve mentioned before, are not.

This would be a good opportunity to thank the Labour party for what they did. Not only did they bring in hundreds of thousands of Muslims, many of whom we cannot trust to NOT suddenly get it into their heads that they should kill us, but they also criminalised speaking out against the dangerous ideology of Islam. If it turns out that the content of the ‘offensive tweet’ is not calling for violence, but is instead valid criticism of an ideology that is daily proving itself to be unfit for residence in a civilised nation, then that is a worrying level of censorship.

Such arrests, if they are indeed for criticising Islam, should be compared to how often extremist Islamic preachers have been allowed to abuse our freedoms and peddle hatred, call for Christians and others to be killed, and yet are allowed to get away with it. Very few of these poison preachers have been arrested, let alone charged. Why the discrepancy? Muslims are allowed to promote hatred, but woe betide those who challenge that Islamic hatred. That is not administering the law in a fair or just way. This is the injustice of multiculturalism, this is Labour’s legacy, unfortunately continued by Cameron, a man who, to be quite frank, is unfit to be Prime Minister.

Although these arrests were made because the Police were acting on a complaint (probably from some Islamic pressure group or similar), I believe that they are primarily ‘intimidation arrests’ to try to deter other people from expressing their righteous anger at not only the Islamic murder of Drummer Rigby, but at the other problems that Islam has brought to our shores, the grooming gangs, the welfare dependency etc.

The difference between how different groups are treated is becoming astounding. The free pass given to Islamic hate-mongers, who are calling for murders, compared to arrests of those who speak out about Islamic problems, is a worrying indication as to how deeply the British Police have been corrupted by political correctness. In some areas, it appears that the Police no longer enforce the law in an honest and equitable way, but with one eye always on the ‘category’ of the person they are dealing with. One group is treated one way and another group another, what a complete multikulti mess that urgently needs to be cleared up.

Links

Bristol Post

http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/men-arrested-Bristol-offensive-tweets-Woolwich/story-19069773-detail/story.html

Sky news, ‘Offensive tweets’ story

http://news.sky.com/story/1095026/woolwich-murder-offensive-tweets-arrests

ADDENDUM:

Russian news sources are reporting that up to 1,200 extra police have been detailed to protect mosques in Britain in case of a violent reaction to the murder of Drummer Rigby following his murder by Muslims.

It is strange, isn’t it, how the police can find an extra 1,200 police to guard mosques when for over a decade they seemed to find it difficult to allocate manpower or even enthusiasm for dealing with the problem of Islamic Grooming Gangs

See: http://english.ruvr.ru/news/2013_05_23/Woolwich-attack-Security-stepped-up-around-London-mosques/

 

 

Not just terrorism…..

…… don’t forget there’s the kiddy-fiddling as well.

Are you feeling the ‘enrichment’ yet?

While many peoples attention is quite rightly focused on the appalling, brutal attack on a British solider in Woolwich, we should not forget the long ignored (by the police) problem of Islamic Grooming Gangs and similar sex criminals.

The case of the High Wycombe gang of alleged groomers started this week, and it is doubtful that now that prosecutions have started, that it will be the last trial of its type.

The Kafircrusader blog said:

A young girl was repeatedly raped and sexually abused by 10 friends in Buckinghamshire over a five-year period, a court has heard.

The victim was just 11 when she was groomed and raped by Iblal Fiaz, 21, who plied her with alcohol and drugs, Oxford Crown Court was told.

The girl – who cannot be named for legal reasons – believed she was in a relationship with Fiaz despite only being 11, Eleanor Laws QC said.

The barrister said after gaining her trust and after she turned 12, Fiaz made her perform sex acts on his brother Khasim Fiaz, 23, and at least eight other men.

She was made to take part in group sex sessions in cars, residential properties and a hotel with men taking it in turns to abuse her, it was alleged.

Fiaz regularly threatened the victim who was also fed cocktails of drugs such as cocaine, cannabis and ecstasy to reduce her reluctance, the jury of seven men and five women heard.

The offences are said to have been carried out in High Wycombe between 2007 and 2012 when the victim was between 11 and almost 16 and isolated from friends and family.”

Kafircrusader‘s blog is carrying the full shocking story

What to do to protest peacefully against the savagery of Islam in the UK

Muslims have murdered a British soldier, and troops are now being advised not to wear their uniforms in the street because of the danger of being killed by Bearded Savages. It is difficult to articulate how angry this makes me. That British soldiers are now being forbidden to wear their uniform in their own country because of the fear of attack from random bearded savages, is a disgusting indication of the problems that Britain now has with Jihadism.

There must be a proper and effective reckoning following this attack which claimed the life of Drummer Lee Rigby. Those who kill, and threaten to kill us, need to be dealt with harshly, along with their sympathisers and fellow travellers. In order to achieve this reckoning, the appeasement of Islam must stop, and Islamo-realism must now prevail in our minds and actions, not just those of Government but by all of us. This sort of attack on one of our soldiers and indeed our country, by Islamic terrorists deserves protest, but it must be peaceful and effective protest.

Someone once told me on here that there was no point in just reporting Islamic horrors if there are not, in addition, suggestions on what to do about the problem. Here are some suggestions on peaceful protest, consumer action and political things you could do.

Firstly, being a ‘constitutionalist’ and someone who respects honest democracy, I’d say the first thing you need to do is vote. Vote for those candidates who are Islamo-sceptic and not for those, who when challenged about Islam, parrot diversity bullshit, on the lines of ‘all religions are the same’. We must remove, via the ballot box, those politicians who a) appease Islam and b) refuse to see the scale of the problem or even acknowledge that an Islam problem exists.

Do not support charities or community groups that appease Islam, whether that be making positive and often untrue statements about Islam, or if the said community group gives facilities to Islamic groups. Even more importantly do not give to Islamic ‘charities’, because money and clothes given to Islamic charitable organisations can end up in the hands of terrorists or their sympathisers.

Challenge the lazy ‘multikulti’ thinking of Vicars, Rabbis, Priests, Teachers and other similar personages, many of whom so desparately want to live in peace with Islam that they wilfully ignore the violence inherent in Islamic ideology. They have closed their eyes to the problem because to admit there is a problem would disturb their worldview.

Do not collude with ‘race hate’ witch-hunts by the police and local government that primarily benefit Islam. Do not co-operate with police or local authority anti-racism campaigns and do not grass up those who peacefully speak out against the ideology of Islam. Always remember that Islam is not a race, it is an ideology.

Do not buy Halal certified products. Some of the money paid to the Halal food certification authorities for Halal supervision is diverted to Islamic charities and one ‘charitable’ cause according to Islamic law is the support of those carrying out Jihad.

Do not buy from non-Islamic businesses who buy into the whole ‘diversity’ idea and which support organisations that primarily favour Muslims, give money to Islamic charities, or make concessions to Islamic demands for prayer facilities etc.

Protest if your child’s school is trying to brainwash them into thinking that Islam is peaceful. Also protest if the school appeases Islam by bringing in a whole school halal only menu.

Keep under close watch the statements made, and the behaviour of, your local Islamic community. It is now becoming increasingly clear that there are good reasons to believe that some of Britain’s Islamic ghettos are not loyal to the UK and may be sheltering or encouraging those who wish to kill us.

Do not buy the bullshit put out by Islamic groups, dawa merchants, converts and others who try to tell you that such murderers are not acting in an Islamic way. It is quite plain that Islam is the motivation of so many atrocities and although there are fluffy bits of the Koran, such fluff is abrogated by the commands to kill non-Muslims which came later in the chronology of the assembly of the Koran.

Peacefully protest against Mosque plans. Mosques are not only places of worship, they are also far too often forward command posts for an army that wishes to enslave us and whose followers have so often declared war on us, and our culture.

Above all speak. Speak to your friends, your family, your workmates and those from your church, synagogue, temple or meeting room. Speak of the threat that Islam poses and by doing so warn and educate others. Do not rush to pick up the flaming torch and go down to the local mosque because such actions will only be exploited by the Left-Islamic alliance and are anyway, illegal. Use your anger at Islam and what it is doing to our nation in a more constructive way.

As regarding the boycotting of Muslim-owned businesses, that is something that people need to square with their own individual consciences. Personally I feel that culture or religion based boycotts have a tendency to punish both the innocent and the guilty, and can unjustly affect Mr Khan the innocent atheist who just happened to be born a Muslim, just as much as it justifiably effects the local jihadist who’s plotting to kill you and your family. The promoters and enablers of the ideology of Islam, and their non Muslim appeasers are a far better and more appropriate target.

Fighting with the old bill in the streets, as we saw in Woolwich last night, is not the right way, and is completely pointless and counterproductive. The enemy are not the ones wearing the blue uniforms, the enemy are the ones who cry ‘Allahu Akhbar’ and who desire our deaths. However, it could be said to be understandable that people are angry at continual police appeasement of Islam, most nobably over the growing number of Islamic Grooming Gang horrors, for example. This could have been one of the drivers for some of the anger and violence directed at the Police in Woolwich last night. The enemies are the terrorists, the Islamic supremacists, Taqiyya propagandists like the Muslim Council of Britain, the Dawa liars, the clerical fascists, and those parts of British Islamic communities who support or fund them or turn a blind eye to their activities.

This attack will wake up more and more people to the problems that Islam has brought to our shores, and because they will have seen such bestial Islamic behaviour in full view, then they will cease to be quiet about both the ideology of Islam and the depredation it so often brings. Hopefully this attack and the aftermath will also open up the eyes of Muslims, and encourage them to read and understand just how much violent bollocks they are expected by their ideology to believe, and by doing so, cross their own Rubicon, and choose life, freedom and justice instead of death, oppression and hate.

My prayers are with the family of the murdered British soldier, Drummer Lee Rigby, 25, and my utter contempt is reserved for those who have created, and exacerbated, the problems of Islam in Britain.

Savages!

This morning we wake up to find that yet again we have Islamic savagery being practised on the streets of Britain. The deliberate mass importation, mostly by Labour, of Islamic savages, is starting to endanger the UK and its people. The previous Government of John Major shouldn’t be let off the hook either. His Government turned a blind eye to the hatred and violence promoted by the likes of the Hamza’s and Qatada’s of this world because such Islamic terror promoters were only fomenting violence overseas and were not seen as a threat to the UK.

We need to be honest and admit that our Muslim guests have not brought us new businesses, art or intellectual achievement, as many of the previous waves of immigration have done, but instead has brought us a constant parade of grisly crimes, corruption and sedition.

Many of us who observe the effect of Islam on Britain do not consider that the murder of our soldiers, the mass raping of our children, the corruption of political parties and local authorities, the aggressive expansionism, fraud and astonishing levels of welfare dependency, as ‘enriching’ us one little bit. Surely this act of appalling violence, committed against one of those who are tasked to protect this country, must be the turning point in how the Government and the people themselves deal with the disgusting ideology of Islam. Are we as a nation going to still continue to see Islam as a peaceful religion like others, or are we going to wake up and see Islam for the fascist death cult that it so often shows itself to be?

It also seems that the Metropolitan police are panicking about the potential angry reaction to this appalling attack. Commander Simon Letchford of the Met said: “I am asking people to remain calm, and avoid unnecessary speculation.” What is there to speculate about Commander Letchford? It was only an hour or so before the murderers were revealed as Islamic savages and not disgruntled Methodists.

Islam is a cancerous growth in the body politic of the UK and it is now time for the state, which we pay handsomely for through our taxes, to start administering effective treatment against this tumour before it damages us, and our communities, any more than it has done already. We have already seen reprisal actions such as an attempted mosque burning in Essex and an attack on a Mosque in Kent. Such actions should not be encouraged, but this blog has warned that such attacks would definitely occur if the agents of the state didn’t get to grips with the treasonous cuckoos we have mistakenly allowed to reside in the national nest.

This attack must be a watershed both for how the Government and the citizenery deal with the ideology of Islam. There must be no more appeasement, no more nodding through of Mosque building plans, no more Taqiyya-spouting liars taking tea with Govt ministers, no more ‘diversity’ officers making excuses for murderous ideologues, no more acceptance of ‘non violent extremists’ in the Civil Service and no more parroting the laughable and highly untrue phrase, ‘religion of peace’.

If we do not deal with our undoubted Islamic problems that the UK now has, then we are only putting our own heads, and those of our children, on the chopping block in the future. We cannot afford any more inaction on this issue.

Links

Police statement on ITV from Commander Simon Letchford

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsx6_jlBwlA

Sky report on attacks on Mosques in Essex and Kent. Personally I’m very surprised that there have been only two attacks on mosques, as Muslims and their communal groups don’t exactly go out of their way to make themselves popular with the majority community.

http://news.sky.com/story/1094547/woolwich-edl-protests-as-mosques-targeted

UPDATE:

Brief mention on Sky that one of the perpetrators was a convert to Islam of Nigerian Heritage.  What a surprise, or not.