From Elsewhere: The appalling human and financial cost of Islamic incest.

A terrible product of Islamic inbreeding.

I’ve written here about the problems with Islamic incest before, but this article obtained via an Australian blog lays out the full human cost of Islamic incest. The figures that can be found from within the article are shocking to say the least. One figure that relates to the UK is gobsmacking. Births from people of Pakistani Islamic heritage were 3.4% but this cohort produced a shocking 30% of all recorded recessive gene disorders and still births.

The writer, Nicholai Sennels, in an article published on the Pickering Post blog said:

A tragic phenomenon which is taking a terrible toll on everyone involved.

There is a dire phenomenon rising in Europe that is crippling entire societies and yet the continent sleeps, refusing not only to confront the destructive elephant in the room, but also to admit its very existence.

The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of Muslim inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.

The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “Islamophobe” and a “racist.”

A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the Muslim community is accused of whipping up hatred against Muslim people.

But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects.

Fighting against this Islamic practice stems from a pro-Muslim calling, since identifying destructive ideologies and practices in Islam enables the protection of the Muslim people from harm.

Massive inbreeding
Massive inbreeding among Muslims has been going on since their prophet allowed first-cousin marriages more than 50 generations (1,400 years) ago. For many Muslims, therefore, intermarriage is regarded as being part of their religion.

In many Muslim communities, it is a source of social status to marry one’s daughter or son to his or her cousin. Intermarriage also ensures that wealth is kept within the family.

Islam’s strict authoritarianism plays a large role as well: keeping daughters and sons close gives families more power to control and decide their choices and lifestyles.

Westerners have a historical tradition of being ready to fight and die for their country.

Muslims, on the other hand, are bound together less by patriotism, but mainly by family relations and religion.

Intermarrying to protect the family and community from outside non-Islamic influence is much more important to Muslims living in a Western nation than integrating into that nation and supporting it.

Today, 70% of all Pakistanis are inbred and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30% (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 “More stillbirths among immigrants“).

A rough estimate reveals that close to half of everybody living in the Arab world is inbred.

A large percentage of the parents that are blood related come from families where intermarriage has been a tradition for generations.

A BBC investigation in Britain several years ago revealed that at least 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin.

The Times of India affirmed that “this is thought to be linked to the probability that a British Pakistani family is at least 13 times more likely than the general population to have children with recessive genetic disorders.”

The BBC’s research also discovered that while British Pakistanis accounted for just 3.4% of all births in Britain, they accounted for 30% of all British children with recessive disorders and a higher rate of infant mortality.

It is not a surprise, therefore, that, in response to this evidence, a Labour Party MP has called for a ban on first-cousin marriage.

Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths.

One study comparing Norwegians and Pakistanis shows the risk that the child dies during labour increases by 50%. The risk of death due to autosomal recessive disorders — e.g., cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy — is 18 times higher.

Risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Mental health is also at risk: the probability of depression is higher in communities where consanguine marriages are also high.

The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.

And then there are the findings on intelligence. Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 (criterion for being “retarded”) increases 400% among children from cousin marriages.

An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academy found that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.”

Another study found that Indian Muslim schoolboys whose parents were first cousins tested significantly lower than boys whose parents were unrelated in a non-verbal test on intelligence.

It is estimated that one third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a foreign background and 64% of school children in Denmark with Arabic parents are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system.”

Read the rest and weep at: http://pickeringpost.com/story/the-cost-of-islamic-incest/1316

Islamic inbreeding and the subsequent retardation of mental processes may be another reason why Islamic societies produce the sort of violent, abusive, aggressive people that are the hallmark of those who have the misfortune to be born in the Islamic world.

Because marrying your first cousin is permitted and encouraged by Islamic religious law we can see how the ideology of Islam not only destroys one generation, but destroys the generations that come after.

Most religions, with the notable exception of Islam, have restrictions on how close a relation a person is allowed to have sexual relations with. The biblical book of Leviticus for example is not only as some may think, a book that just bangs on about gays, but was for its time a very sensible guide to who not to sleep with if you want a healthy family, a healthy tribe and a healthy nation.

This Islamic inbreeding is just another example of how much we are paying for having Islam within our borders. We pay in welfare, we pay in the shattered lives of rape victims, we pay the armed forces the extra costs it requires to protect us from Islamic terror, and now we are paying for the products of Islamic incest.

There is almost nothing positive that I can think of that Islam has brought to civilised societies. All the ideology of Islam has brought to Britain is conflict, rape, parasitism, genetic diseases corruption and death.

 

Hat Tip for alert for story M-Cat on Twitter (@catstrangler101 )

 

 

4 Comments on "From Elsewhere: The appalling human and financial cost of Islamic incest."

  1. Furor Teutonicus | September 9, 2013 at 12:40 pm |

    XX Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths.XX

    They snuff it? GOOD! Saves us having to do it.

    I can not see the problem here.

    Like the flu, they will soon die out once summer comes.

    • Fahrenheit211 | September 9, 2013 at 12:52 pm |

      Unfortunately nature is much tougher than that. Although incest increases the risk of still births it doesn’t prevent live births per se. There are still enough live births to keep the cult going.

      I wish their ideology would die off as well. The most positive thing any Muslim could do to improve both their lives and the lives of their progeny would be to give up Islam. This story backs up that which I say constantly, which is that the first victims of Islam are Muslims.

      • Furor Teutonicus | September 9, 2013 at 6:46 pm |

        Please no body get me wrong here. I have many friends here who are Muslim, and they are O.K.

        Thing is, they think the same about their “Brothers” as I (we) do.

        Youceff, for example. From Syria. Tried suicide. I visit him two or three times per week in hospital. (Closed ward, actually…. a SERIOUS case…) drinks beer, eats pork (Schnitzell) in abandon, calls his “Brothers” Sand niggers.

        Two Bosnian muslim women who I help to learn German and English. NO problem. I have been to their houses and met their husbands, and had a GREAT time. Beer, rum, Whiskey. “You want pork? We cook pork!”….. AND BLOODY good friend-ship.

        They are NOT all “bad”, there ARE some good ones out there.

        You just have to look for them.

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Incest allowed in Islam |

Comments are closed.