The last time I looked at the Bible it did not say: ‘sell justice to the savages’, but that is what appears to be happening.

bent scales

You shall not pervert justice. You shall not show partiality, and you shall not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and subverts the cause of the righteous. Deut 16:19

The epigram above comes from the Biblical book of Deuteronomy (in Hebrew Devarim, which roughly translates to ‘words’) and it is not only one of the most powerful, inspiring, universalistic and long-lasting of the 613 religious and practical commandments contained in the Hebrew Bible (aka Old Testament), but is a glowing example of what a Justice system should be. Sadly, reading it also highlights how far short of that great ideal of Justice Britain has fallen.

For the last few years now there have been in the UK both in real life and on social media growing rumblings that successive government’s multiculturalist policies are causing a ‘justice deficit’. ‘Hate crime’ policies for example are said by their proponents to protect vulnerable members of minority groups from attack or harassment. They may well have protected one or two LGBT people from being called ‘Queer’ or ‘Tranny’ or ‘Lezzer’ by drunks in the street or on housing estates, but they have also had much more darker and dangerous effects on the legal system. These dangerous effects are starting to be noticed by more people, but even more need to be made aware of what is happening. The original, reasonable sounding at first, hate crime policies that were brought in over the last couple of decades, are morphing into a form of ‘justice apartheid’ and takes the form of different justice for people from different groups. If you are a member of a group with protected characteristics, such as a Muslim, and you are attacked then your attacker will get a heftier prison sentence or other punishment if they have injured you. The alleged victim doesn’t even have to prove that there was any discriminatory motivation by the attacker, only that they ‘perceive’ it that way. The alleged attacker on the other hand, even if innocent of having a motivation that was driven by hatred for the attacked persons skin colour or religion or sexuality, has to prove that they were not. The alleged victim is allowed to claim, even if factually untrue, that the attacker or harasser was motivated by hatred for what they are. That doesn’t look to me like Justice.

It looks like treating people differently because of an accident of birth, something that the Left decried when it was the aristocracy benefiting from a justice system that was skewed and favoured one social class over another. If it’s wrong to let a criminal off with a minor punishment because they are a member of the aristocracy then it is also wrong to give someone a harsher penalty because their alleged victim is one of the Left and, sadly now the State’s, Islamic pets. There is a great irony in Muslims getting a better standard of Justice than the rest of us get and that is that such a policy is what Muslims do when they gain control of a country. Does anybody think that Christians get a fair justice deal in Pakistan or Jews the same in Morocco? Of course not. Islamic law is an inherently discriminatory system and it is madness to feed the inbuilt self importance of Muslims by giving out harsher punishments to non-Muslims than Muslims for similar offences.

Here’s a few historical examples of what is increasingly looking like becoming an increasingly ‘bent’ police and justice system in the UK.

First this one. Bear in mind the harm or potential harm that these defendants caused or could have caused

The Guardian reported on the 15th October 2015 that a teenager who had downloaded bomb -making instructions and who had approved of the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby and was obsessed with suicide bombing, was given a non-custodial sentence. The Manchester schoolgirl who cannot be named for legal reasons, was allowed to say sorry and that she was not a terrorist and then released by the court with no more punishment than to have a state appointed mentor who will tell her ‘Islamic terrorism is bad, OK’. This teen had the opportunity, the knowledge, the contacts and the motivation to do great harm and she should have been given a much more harsh punishment.

Secondly this outrageous example of the actions of Britain’s bent judicial benches. A Muslim man who raped a 13 year old girl whom he groomed via Facebook was given a non-custodial sentence by a Judge who said that the attackers Islamic upbringing had taught him that women were inferior beings. The Daily Mail in reporting this appalling act of judicial appeasement said:

Adil Rashid, 18, claimed he was not aware that it was illegal for him to have sex with the girl because his education left him ignorant of British law.

Yesterday Judge Michael Stokes handed Rashid a suspended sentence, saying: ‘Although chronologically 18, it is quite clear from the reports that you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.’

Earlier Nottingham Crown Court heard that such crimes usually result in a four to seven-year prison sentence.

But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.

What about the damage that has been done to his victim? Or the damage done to the public’s confidence that the judicial system will be fair? Yes, the offender should get the most appropriate sentencing, and sometimes this sentence will not chime with the public mood, but this is not one of those. This was not an accidental offence, the offender didn’t meet a girl who lied about her age in a nightclub or a pub, this was a carefully thought out offence. Here we have a young man who has deliberately targeted a vulnerable girl using social media, raped her even though he knew the girl was under the age of consent, and then, when arrested, sought to blame the girl for seducing him. It’s beyond scandalous that an offence where the sentence would normally be in the region of 4 to 7 years should be disposed of like this. Not only is it overtly and stupidly ‘liberal’ to impose such a laughable sentence but it shows just how far Islamic attitudes have been co-opted and also why it is so vital that Islamic attitudes are countered. At the very least, because of this particular savages ‘backwardness’ and complete lack of empathy for the victim or understanding of his actions I would expect to see some sort of hospital order made, because even from reading the Mail report, there seems to be something ‘not quite right’ about Rashid.

Thirdly we have the appalling and often unpunished phenomena of Islamic Rape Gangs. These gangs have been allowed by police, social services, councils and others in authority to operate with virtual impunity for decades. They’ve been victimising girls and young women right across the country but it is only in recent years, following the highlighting of the issue of Islamic Rape Gangs by the likes of the EDL and those journalists who are still honest, that anything is being done about them. The Authorities seemed to have taken the view that ‘it’s part of Islamic culture’ or made excuses such as ‘the girls made lifestyle choices to be prostituted’ but what it comes down to at heart is the differential justice system where Muslims can play the victim card even when they are the victimiser. The Islamic Rape Gangs were given a free pass to abuse, rape and traffick British women at will. If that is not ‘justice sold’ and a breach of the Biblical commandment to uphold honest Justice then I don’t know what is.

Fourthly we have the spectacle of Islamic hate-mongers who pack the streets of our capital city calling for the destruction of the State of Israel and shouting their approval for the murder of innocent Jews there. Or the hostility shown by so many Muslims in Britain for our Armed Services or the major mosques who regularly host hate preachers. Muslims seem to have the right to spout hate filled bollocks about whoever they choose to but when we call Muslims out on their hate filled bollocks, all to often it is the opponent of Islam that is arrested, charged and convicted. It’s wrong that a Muslim can stand up and say for example ‘Kill the Jews’ and get away with it but the non-Muslim who opposes Islamic anti-Semitism is often silenced or called an ‘Islamophobe’.

But it is when the boot is on the other foot that the sickening bias is most egregious, and their have been three recent cases that serve as examples of how Britain’s justice system has become yet another ‘Islamopanderer’.

The first is from June 2014 and concerns a teenager, a middle aged man and one other man who were presumably angry at the way that Muslims are behaving and how Islam is being pandered to, being jailed for putting bacon on the doors of a mosque and throwing some inside. An unpleasant action many will say but did they really, honestly deserve sentences of 12 months, 10 months and 10 months? Many would say that it did not and it was only because Muslims were the ‘victims’ of this incident that such harsh sentences were imposed.

The second and third examples are much more recent and what is noticeable about them is the sheer lightning speed that the police have managed to collar the alleged perpetrators of these two incidents. If only the police could have been as quick in dealing with the Islamic Rape Gangs or the Islamic political and electoral corruption that occurred in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets?

Both of the following examples show people getting really cheesed off with Islam and Muslims and although the MSM outlets that have published them follow the now standard policy of decrying the ‘Islamophobia’, they were mostly of minimal violence and would once have been called a ‘disagreement’ or a ‘bit of argy bargy’ that probably would not warrant much involvement by the legal system. However because Muslims are the alleged targets of these two public transport rants, the State has gone in with all guns blazing. The full resources of the State have been used to apprehend someone who said something that a Muslim didn’t like in the first case and which merely ended up with a thrown zimmer frame in the other.

Here’s the first one which shows a Black British woman ranting at a Muslim and pointing out some of the well known deficiencies of Islamic culture such as rudeness, getting in people’s faces, the violence associated with Islam and the growing support for theocratic fascist groups like ISIS. ‘Fucking ISIS bitches’ seems quite a reasonable statement to a Muslim when faced with the enormity of the crimes carried out by Muslims.

You can view a section of this particular video, along with a long whinge about ‘racism’ from Joseph Harker, at the Guardian website or you can see a fuller version on the Live Leak website via the link below

The second video was allegedly shot in North London on a bus heading towards Tottenham. It shows a man giving some serious verbal to a Turkish man sitting across the aisle from him. The angry man accused the Turk of milking the UK benefits system, probably being wanted for noncing in Turkey and of failing to integrate by learning to speak English. The spark for the confrontation is not part of the released video and may have started before the person who filmed this got their camera out. I can well imagine that the Turk issued or was felt to issue some insult to the person seen to be getting angry. Personally I think the accusations of noncing, welfare sponging and lack of integration show that this particular ‘Mr Angry’ has quite the handle on what Islam and Muslims are doing to the UK society and culture.

Here’s the Daily Mail with the video of Mr Angry and the Turk. Although as before with the Guardian the paper is in full-on ‘oh the humanity, oh the Islamophobia’ mode, it’s plain to see that Mr Angry isn’t attacking the Turk for his race or his nationality, but his dodgy religious ideology.

As I stated earlier on in this piece in the past neither of these incidents would have warranted the sort of massive police search for the perpetrators that has ensued. I’d also wager that if this was a case of a non-Muslim being harassed by a Muslim, then the police would be doing the very best they could to push the matter under the carpet or find some other excuse for not aiming the lance of the law at the Muslim alleged offender. This link from an earlier story on Fahrenheit211 showing how the Metropolitan Police went out of their way to not deal with dodgy Muslims, is an example of how complaints about Muslims seem to be getting less police attention or action than complaints by Muslims.

This blog is not the only one to notice that there is a disturbing trend to bend the justice system to suit Islamic custom and it is having and likely to continue to have dire effects on the British justice system. Brietbart for example pointed out that courts that make judgements that raping a Muslim girl is worse than raping a non-Muslim or allowing Muslims to wear face obscuring garments in court is attacking the idea of equal justice and the right for accuser and accused to face each other in open court.

It is these cases and other similar ones that is making me and others believe that the British justice system is being slowly but steadily undermined by Islam. Foolish judges, lawyers and legal academics seem to be all too willing to disregard a legal system that evolved over hundreds of years and changed from the ancient brutality of Trial by Ordeal, to the post-Victorian and modern justice system, that attempts where practicable to treat all those who come before a court equally.

There is no justice in Islam and this sort of Islamopandering by our courts and police and other parts of the criminal and civil justice system is highlighting that lack of Justice.

We should as a nation look at ourselves and feel ourselves shamed that we have allowed a small coterie of Left wingers, Islamic supremacists and fools to sell the British justice system to the savage ideology of Islam. These judicial tinkerers who want to accommodate Islam in our judicial system have departed so far from the ideal of a fair justice system as set out in Deuteronomy 16:19 as to make a complete mockery of that ancient and valuable Commandment.


Rashid the Rapist story from Daily Mail

Laughably lenient sentence on jihadi schoolgirl

Prison sentences for bacon attack on mosque

Metropolitan Police not interested in complaint about Muslim males attacking woman

Britain’s bent justice system from Brietbart

2 Comments on "The last time I looked at the Bible it did not say: ‘sell justice to the savages’, but that is what appears to be happening."

  1. Possibly you may want to edit (for meaning) the sentence beginning ‘I’d also wager … ‘.
    Please delete my comment, unless I have things hopelessly wrong and you choose then to have a good-natured poke at my tired brain.

    As ever, I am impressed by your research and reasoning.

    • Fahrenheit211 | October 22, 2015 at 5:34 am |

      Derek. Thank you very much for pointing out that error, I have now corrected it and edited it for meaning. You don’t have anything wrong, I did phrase that wrongly and confusingly.

      Thank you very much as well for your compliment.

Comments are closed.