Another dodgy Islamic product of a thoroughly Islamised London borough

Map showing the location of the by now horrifically Islamised London Borough of Newham

 

Those who naively believe that Islam is compatible with British life and that it doesn’t degrade wherever this ideology sets up shop, would be disabused of their naivety if they spent any time in the London Borough of Newham. This borough used to be relatively mixed but still a borough which was composed of a majority of White British people of various heritages (Irish, Jewish, English, German, South African etc). There was also a long established Black community that was, in the main, integrated quite well.

Things were not perfect there, as in any London borough there was crime and poverty as well as people who worked hard and transcended these ills. But then Islam came. The borough ceased to be a relatively mixed and cohesive environment and took on a distinctly Islamic tribal character. The more Islam that has been injected into this borough, the worse things have become for the areas non-Muslims and especially the indigenous White British people. Many of the White British people have fled ‘down the line’ to the outskirts of London or into Essex in order to bring up their families away from what they see as the pernicious influence of Islam. Those who have remained are stuck with sending their kids to schools that are allegedly according to my contacts and sources, promoting Islam to non-Muslim children with an unseemly gusto. The growth of Islam in this area has been truly shocking in its swiftness and Islam has been aided and abetted in its takeover of the borough by Newham’s Labour Council. Between the census points of 2001 and 2011, the population of Muslims in Newham rose from 25% to 32% and now Islam is so politically significant that Labour cannot do anything but pander to Islam and to Islamic interests in order to keep the same level of power that they have become used to.

One of the effects of the Islamisation of Newham, apart from the increase in violence, sex crime, political corruption and social degradation, is the number of dodgy criminal Muslims that Newham’s Islamic communities are producing. In the case that I will quote today, which I have seen in the Daily Mail and was alerted to by ‘The Religion of Peace‘, we can see that disregard for the law and for British security, is not something confined to the lower level Muslims in Newham but also encompasses religious and community leaders from Newham’s Muslims.

The Mail is reporting that an Islamic community leader, Kamran Malik has been gaoled for twelve months for scamming so called ‘asylum seekers’ out of thousands of pounds by telling them that he could get them legal residency in the UK. He offered immigration advice and posed as a solicitor when he was not entitled to do either. Malik stood in several elections in the past for a minor political party called Communities United. This party looked like it took a standard ‘Old Labour’ line on many things but interestingly all but one of the candidates that it stood in the 2015 general election are Muslim. It had policies that on the face of it would appeal to traditional Labour voters but looked like it may well have been a more Islamic political vehicle if you dig beneath the surface. This party has not contested elections since 2015.

Here’s part of the Daily Mail article. As is usual policy here the original quoted text is in italics whereas this blog’s comments are in plain text.

The Daily Mail said:

A Muslim political leader who tried to sue Donald Trump has been jailed after he scammed migrants out of thousands of pounds for bogus immigration advice.

Kamran Malik, 50, ran KM Legal Ltd which charged extortionate fees for unlawful advice to people at risk of being deported from Britain.

Malik, of Plaistow, east London, was jailed for 12 months today for conning half a dozen migrants out of more than £16,000 between November 2014 and October 2016.

His victims included a political refugee married to an European citizen seeking residency status for family dependants, a woman seeking asylum after fleeing Iran and a man who was threatened by Malik after refusing to pay his fees.

What a charming character and what an asset this Malik geezer is to the United Kingdom – NOT!

Readers should note the name of Malik’s company as we see it, or a name very similar to it, again in the manifesto of the Communities United Party. The CUP website said:

The Communities United Party consists of staff who work tirelessly to ensure that people gain access to justice that they are entitled to by right and not merely by privilege of birth. The Party has a legal arm, KM Legal Advisory, which offers free legal advice and consultation in: Human Rights, Landlords & Tenants, Employment, Education, Crime and Immigration law.

Doesn’t it strike you as odd, dodgy even, that a party should have as a legal arm a firm or a practise intimately connected to the leader of the party? When I first saw this it looked very much like this party was at least in part acting as a conduit to funnel potential customers to Malik’s legal practise.

The Daily Mail continued:

Malik, a former candidate for the Mayor of Newham, hit the headlines in 2016 after his failed bid to sue US President Donald Trump over his claim that parts of London are so radicalised that police fear for their lives. 

Southwark Crown Court heard today that Malik had a previous conviction for two offences of providing immigration advice and services when not being qualified to do so dating back to 2012.

Malik was jailed for those offences for 24 weeks in 2014.

Judge Stephen Robbins told Malik at Southwark Crown Court today: ‘The really aggravating factors in this case are that once again you are back before the courts after being sentenced for similar activities in 2014.

The word or phrase that the Judge may be looking for is either ‘incorrigible’ or ‘usual Islamic disrespect for the law’. Malik is a total piss taker, an exploiter of the stupid and the vulnerable, who has passed himself off as a ‘man of the community’ who can be trusted. He has no respect for the law or for human decency and he shares those characteristics with many of the other Muslim agitators that operate in Newham.

I’m surprised that this guy felt that it would be safe after previously being gaoled for similar offences to start up in the immigration scam that he had operated before. This leads me to believe that elements in the Islamic community and the local political Establishment may have turned a blind eye to his activities.

Does anyone truly believe that if I, a non-Muslim, was convicted of selling dodgy cut and shut cars (a similar level of fraud) and was imprisoned for it, that I would be allowed to start up again in the same business in the same area without some form of sanction or police or trading standards interest? These are serious offences that Malik has been imprisoned for such as posing as a solicitor or giving the impression to clients that one was so legally qualified. Surely any competent trading standards department would have looked very carefully at Malik and his activities and been on alert for any instance of Malik starting up again? It seems to be the case here that neither the police nor local trading standards in Newham bothered with Malik and his activities until they became too blatant to ignore and complaints were made about Malik’s immigration advice. Why is that? Is it down to the ubiquitious ‘cuts’ that the Left whine about or is it that Malik has been shielded in the past by the Muslim community in Newham and their political allies?

We cannot discount some form of ‘communal corruption’ in the background of this case with the authorities turning a blind eye because of Malik’s political pretensions. There has been within living memory in Newham a well seated culture of corruption on the local council. Back in the day it was allegations of corruption that centred around freemasonry and the influence those networks had on council activities and council choices. Now the major problem in Newham appears to be Islam related corruption, with Islamic groups having a considerable influence over the policies that Newham council pursue. In effect Newham seems to have exchanged one form of alleged corruption, that of freemasonry for another.

Islam has almost irrepairably damaged the social fabric of the London Borough of Newham. Islam, along with its criminals, scammers and influence peddlers have turned a once liveable borough into an Islamic leftist banana republic. Is it any wonder that most of the indigenous Britons left as soon as they saw the writing on the wall? Malik represents what Islam has done to Newham, it has put on a false smile whilst conning others out of everything they own including their birthrights. Malik is the dodgy Islamic product of an equally dodgy Islamised London borough.