Unlike some on the political Right or Centre Right I have a lot of time for the political commentator Peter North. Mr North has quite rightly in my view called out the poor quality of policy proposals from the challenger parties of the Right and the sort of populist slop put out by these parties that will fail at the first hurdle should they every get into government. Now don’t get me wrong, I do believe that Britain needs massive political change of the sort that can only come from the Right and not the Left but it matters who you propose that change and how you manage such change whilst being able to manoeuvrer around pitfalls that may appear in a challenger party’s path.
Mr North has written a brilliant piece about the prospects of Andy Burnham’s government and it’s a piece that I find myself in agreement with.
Mr North said on the X platform:
“Pollyanna Burnham has absolutely no idea what’s about to happen to him. He has a head full of bad ideas that weren’t tried by any of his recent predecessors, not because his predecessors were smarter than him, but because they were rapidly disabused before getting down to business. Burnham, though, thinks that bad ideas will become good ideas if he’s the one implementing them.
For Burnham, the normal laws of political reality do not apply. There are hard lessons for him behind the door of Number Ten, waiting like starved crocodiles for their hapless prey. While this is going to be endlessly entertaining and wholly predictable for us politicos, it is not without consequence. This is the gear shift that pushes the “just about managing” into the “not managing” bracket. This is the turn that pushes businesses and households irrecoverably into the red and upends what people have been struggling to maintain. This is the narcissistic clueless meddling that puts the country into a death spiral. The anger will be palpable. By that, I don’t necessarily mean the sort of riots triggered by the tone-deaf and ineffably useless Starmer. That cannot be ruled out, of course, but this is the inflection point where the normally reserved, who just prefer to get on with their lives, are dragged into the wake turbulence against their will. It’s the bill hike that obliterates the last of their disposable income. It’s the last of the small pleasures that make the drudgery of making ends meet bearable denied – when there’s no longer any reward for taking the punishment – and there’s no end in sight.
This is when Burnham’s entire psychological construct begins to dissolve. The world as he understands it is one where if you’re nice, with good intentions, then you are liked – and the only reason you could dislike such a person is if you yourself are not nice. Starmer was better equipped to be hated because he had no empathy, and public sentiment of any kind had no bearing on his demeanour. Burnham, on the other hand, wants and needs to be liked. This is often a fatal flaw in politicians.
What makes Burnham especially dangerous is that he will pull at any and all levers in search of doing the nice thing, in order to be liked, oblivious to the second order consequences, and will be shocked, surprised and horrified to learn that his every action has the opposite of intended effect on public morale. He will not understand why. He is not capable of understanding why, even if it is explained to him in the most gentle terms by a compassionate softly-spoken primary school teacher.
Unlike, Starmer, though, he won’t go into the bunker to hide. He will take it to mean that people just haven’t gotten to know him yet, and need to see more of him so they can understand that he’s a nice guy and on your side. And when it doesn’t work, he will blame the interface layer. If we don’t get it, it just means something is lost in translation. That’s when nice turns nasty. This is the hole he will keep digging, the scab he simply won’t stop picking until the sore becomes an open wound. WHY WON’T YOU UNDERSTAND HOW NICE I AM??
They say the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. Burnham, though, does not plan to build a road. He intends to drill directly to Hell with industrial tunnelling machines. There is no force of magic that can make socialism work. Crucially, what Burnham doesn’t understand, is that the Labour party has become the party of the status quo for a reason. There is nowhere else for the left to go.
Tony Blair, for all his many faults, was smart enough to understand certain economic laws of gravity. He shitcanned socialism because he knew that you can’t hope to help people if the state is broke. He rebuilt the state as a managerialist welfare dispensary. That might have been a viable avenue for 1997. But “sharing the proceeds of growth” is contingent on actual growth, which is no longer possible in a hyper-regulated, high tax moribund economy. Blairism is as dead as socialism. The bottom line is that there is no left wing solution to what ails us.
Burnham, though, believes enough time has passed for us to have forgotten, so that we’ll mistake old ideas for new ideas. A lot of people probably will fall for it again, but it doesn’t take very long to relearn the lessons. The Finding Out stage happens faster each time. On that basis, Burnham is not a man who will make it to the next election intact. He doesn’t have much to work with. He has no mandate, no fiscal headroom, limited political capital, and absolutely no talent. A man promoted to captain of the Titanic after it hit the iceberg. The only way for Burnham is down, down and down.”
Link to original source
Be the first to comment on "From Elsewhere – Peter North predicts failure from Andy Burnham."