Some weapons grade Islamic bulls**t from 2006

Although many things in this world change, there are other things that remain the same, regardless of the year or the season. One of those immutable things is the bullshit that comes out of the mouths and keyboards of various Islamic persons and groups. ‘Religion of peace’, ‘Islam not a threat to our society’ and ‘nothing to do with Islam’ are just three prime examples of words that mean the exact opposite of what they truly mean.

This story from the Swindon Advertiser from December 2006 has plenty of examples of the work of the Islamic bullshitter. The story centres around a plot by the local education authority to propagandise children with pro-Islam messages. This annoyed some local parents who then withdrew their children from religious education lessons. This might be an old article but the bullshit from the Islamic personages remains the same as does the apoplexy that grips the local diversity mafia and left wing teachers. This article will also give parents just some idea how long and how deeply embedded is Islamic propaganda in our schools. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, it is vital that parents keep a very close eye on what schools are teaching our children. I certainly do not want my child being taught untruths such as ‘Islam is a religion of peace’ or that ‘violence is anathema in Islam’.

We have found over the last decade that we cannot trust teachers to tell the truth about Islam and that they have too often behaved sneakily over this issue. The teaching profession has painted parents who disagree with dishonest messages about Islam being fed to their children, they have booked Islam promoters to teach Islam in school without telling parents and in one case I found, in Cumbria, the education authority sprinkled Islamo-propaganda throughout the whole curriculum in order to stop parents removing their children from lessons that contain Islamic propaganda, which they are entitled to do under the 1944 Education Act if the Islamic Dawa is only confined to Religious Education lessons.

So here from 2006 is the Swindon Advertiser article with my comments in italics.

PARENTS in Swindon want their children pulled from religious education classes that teach them about Islam, town headteachers have warned.

Firstly you have to ask why the headteachers are so worried about this. A Jewish parent can pull their child from RE when it is Christian biased and an atheist parent can withdraw their child from RE if they don’t want their offspring told about religions. The headteachers seem not to be worried about these reasons for parents exercising their rights, but are only concerned that there are people who dislike Islam. Are the headteachers worried that parents are seeing through the Islamic bullshit?

According to the annual report of the Standing Advisory Council On Religious Education – the thinktank of religious leaders, teachers, councillors and community members that meets four times a year to devise the religious education agenda in Swindon’s schools – headteachers are looking for advice after being approached by parents who don’t want their children to learn about Islam.

Rather than ask the middle-class do-gooders of SACRE who spend a lot of their time on the interfaith kumbaya circuit and who have very little idea of what it is like to live in a Muslim dominated area, would it not have been better for the headteachers to ask just why the parents dislike a violent ideology with a penchant for rape and sedition like Islam?

While the report says the parents concerned are a small minority, town Islamic leader Mansoor Khan has warned that fears about his religion must be addressed.

Sniff, sniff and smell the bullshit. Mansoor Khan is correct that fears about Islam should be addressed but it should be addressed not by preventing people from stopping their children being filled with lies about Islam but by Islam not murdering, raping, oppressing and committing acts of terror. Mr Khan may not like it but the reason that Islam is disliked is not down to ‘racism’ or ‘ignorance’ but because of the bad behaviour of far too many Muslims.

Mr Khan, the general secretary of Thamesdown Islamic Association, blamed the boycotts on fears created by the actions of extremists in the July 7 bombings and September 11 attacks in New York.

And why should not the murder of thousands of people in New York and London not make people wary of Islam? Being wary of an ideology that openly states that you, the non-Muslim, should be killed or enslaved is not racism or prejudice, it is the height of common sense.

“That’s bearing on people’s minds but that’s nothing to do with Islam,” Mr Khan said.

Hmmmm! How large is Mr Khan’s bullshit tank? Very large it seems. The attacks on New York and London along with many of the other terror attacks that non-Muslims have had to face, are everything to do with Islam.

“Even if it’s a small problem it still needs to be sorted out.”

Mr Khan has failed to notice that the root of the problem with people not liking Islam is not down to the parents but the ideology of Islam itself.

He said he was willing to talk to any concerned parents at any school, and would investigate joining the advisory council.

Great just what the people of Swindon or any other place in Britain needs, another Islamic bullshitter sitting on an interfaith group saying ‘religion of peace, religion of peace’ every time there is a criticism of Islam or yet another terror attack.

Sacre’s report says religious education classes reflect the multi-faith background of Swindon but the committee’s adviser has been concerned about inquiries from headteachers from a small minority of parents wishing to withdraw their children from teaching on Islam.”

No sensible person would object to the plain facts about different religions being taught, but the suspicion by parents, which has been often justified, is that a dishonest pro-Islam message is being taught to their children.

It has introduced new units for early years in secondary schools to increase the number of faiths covered.

Advisory council member and Parks councillor Fay Howard said the committee would investigate further. “That is a very big concern,” she said.

Note well how the local council and education diversity mafia flocked to this story to denounce the parents who wished to withdraw their children from lessons on Islam.

Coun Howard said the issue had spread to the Sikh community, saying she had heard of one parent requesting their child be withdrawn from an excursion to the temple in Gorse Hill.

Although I would not forbid my child from visiting a Sikh temple, and am a great admirer of the Sikh people, the parent in this case is perfectly within their legal rights to withdraw their child from this trip. The mention of this one case by Councillor Howard looks like an attempt to muddy the waters by making it seem as if all minority religions are being targetted when the primary objection of parents appears to be to pro-Islam propaganda.

Fellow councillor, advisory committee member and former headteacher Eric Shaw said education should expose children to a variety of ideas.

Introducing children to a variety of ideas is a good thing but Islamic propaganda is something completely different and something that any sensible parent would wish to avoid their children being exposed to.

He said the emotive issue involved a very small number of parents but could not be ignored.

“It needs working out, not putting under the carpet,” Coun Shaw said.

Sidelining those parents who object to Islam, attacking them or dismissing their concerns as ’emotive’ shows just whose side these local politicians are on.

“I’m sure this has come up more as a result of recent unfortunate events or if families have somebody in places like Iraq.”

You don’t have to be affected by Islamic terror or have relatives serving in the military to be concerned about Islam, spending some time in some of Britain’s ‘Shariah Shitholes’ is probably enough to show people that Islam is a problem.

Ridgeway School headteacher Steven Colledge said parents at his school had not asked for children to be removed from classes dealing with Islam but he was shocked to hear that it had happened elsewhere.

“It’s hard to understand why a parent wouldn’t want their child educated about the world,” he said.

We all want our children educated about the world, but many of us do not trust teachers to be impartial when it comes to the subject of Islam.

“Religious education is not about converting anybody to Islam or any other religion.”

In that case why are so many Islamic dawa (evangelism) operators allowed into our schools?

Drove Primary School headteacher Nick Capstick said any parent that wanted their child out of classes covering Islam was very shortsighted.

He said no parent at his school – which has pupils from the most ethnically diverse backgrounds in Swindon – had asked that their child be removed from any classes on religion.

If the school already had a tiny minority of English Christian pupils then it is no wonder that there have been so few requests for removal.

His school recently held Christmas carols that involved children of all faiths, including Muslims.

Oooh! Nice bit of ‘kumbaya’ rubbish there.

“We would be reluctant to support any child being withdrawn from a class,” Mr Capstick said.

Your school may be reluctant to support any child wishing to be withdrawn from RE lessons, but Mr Capstick should realise that it is the parents right to do so if he, she or they choose.

He said the key to a happy school and community was understanding and respect of other cultures and beliefs.

All very fluffy but why should we, the non-Muslim, respect Islam which is an ideology that has proved that it doesn’t respect us?

“If you take your child away from that, you are being divisive,” he said.

It is not being ‘divisive’ to withdraw you child from Islamic propaganda lessons, it is an act that results from legitimate parental concern about whether or not their children will be told the truth about the troubling and troublesome ideology of Islam.

Although this story is eight years old, things have not got better. In many different parts of the country, lefty teachers are still in place and still feeding untruths about Islam to children, the naïve interfaith wallahs are still smugly thinking of themselves as righteous and we still have Islamic bullshitters in our schools speaking faeces unto the nation. Any concerned parent should make sure that they are constantly looking over the shoulders of those who teach our children in order to make sure that they are teaching facts and not Islamic propaganda. We want our children to learn the truth about things whether that be in history, science or the humanities, we do not want and should not countenance our children being fed lies about Islam.

Link

Original Swindon Advertiser story

http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/1088041.print/

2 Comments on "Some weapons grade Islamic bulls**t from 2006"

  1. At what age do the schools think a child is old enough to learn about religious belief that says that paedophilia,rape and pillage,murder,bestiality, and human sacrifice is not proscribed?I am concerned about the effect on the mental health of very young people and worry about how many lives will be ruined.The human mind is very vulnerable to some religious teachings and the celebration of eid is not the sort of thing I would want taught to any child of mine.I know it is in the Bible – Genesis ch.22 – but we do not glorify infanticide.Perhaps the “educators” should take out insurance against being sued for bringing on panic attacks and depression.Movies get PG ratings and so should Religious Education.

    • Fahrenheit211 | December 22, 2014 at 1:29 pm |

      Welcome Mike. The problem is the schools want to get the Islamic propaganda started really early. If my child is going to learn anything about Islam then they will learn it from my wife and myself who will use as many factual sources as we have at our disposal. I don’t want my offspring taught by teachers who think it is OK to leave out teaching the nasty side of Islam such as the violence, the sadism, the misogyny.

      As regards Biblical violence then this is where teaching from Judeao-Christian source material differs from teaching from Islamic material. The violence in the Bible, is violence in a historical context and is not intended by modern practitioners of Judaism and Christianity to encourage or incite violence in the here and now. Islam on the other hand does incite violence in the here and now that is a big difference between both the two paths and the Bible and the Koran. You mentioned I believe the Akedah or the Binding of Issac and this section of the Bible has been taken by generation after generation of Jews and Christians to be a story about how human sacrifice is wrong. Abraham was so obsessed with obedience to the Almighty that he was even prepared to sacrifice his own son, the Angels stopped him and gave a Ram for sacrifice instead. Some thinkers have suggested that the Akedah is a folk memory of a social turning point when human sacrifice was abandoned and was replaced by other less destructive forms of worship. You are correct that although potential human sacrifice is mentioned in Gen 22, it is not a glorification nor is it approval of such an act. In fact the Bible decries human sacrifice in some passages such as Lev 18:21 which says that for an Israelite to sacrifice their child to the idol Moloch was an abomination. I’ll take my amateur theologian hat off now LOL.

      No I really don’t want my child fed bullshit about Islam by the teaching ‘profession’.

Comments are closed.