What’s wrong with calling Corbyn a ‘wanker’?

 

The mainstream media used to go out of its way to report important news such as the death of President Kennedy, the Moon landings, D-Day, the Vietnam War and the convuluted private life of former Liberal Party leader Jeremy Thorpe. It was the mainstream media in the form of the Sunday Times that broke the news of the Thalidomide scandal, and it was the Pall Mall Gazette which, in the 19th century, investigated the horrific problems with child prostitution in London and helped to get the age of consent raised from 13 to 16.

Unfortunately the sort of mainstream media we have to day is really not the sort of media that we are looking for. It’s a sad shadow of what I could be and in some cases used to be. Take the case of Sky News and it’s latest fit of the vapours over another ‘nontroversy’ for example.

Conservative Party leader Boris Johnson, a man who has a very good turn of phrase in my opinion, accused Corbyn and those who would ally with him of being self obsessed political onanists. Basically he’s called Corbyn a ‘wanker’. I really don’t see what is wrong with this accusation or the use of the word ‘onanist’, it was a very sharp way of telling the electorate that a possible Corbyn/SNP/Liberal government would make the Brexit issue into the Groundhog Day of British politics.

I see nothing at all wrong with calling Corbyn a wanker and it’s even better that Mr Johnson used that many of today’s journalists might have had to go and look up, such is the woeful abilities of too many of them. In my view, the Remainer politcal alliance that includes Corbyn, the Scots and Welsh Nats, the Greens and the Janus faced and anti-democratic Lib Dems, are much worse than being mere ‘wankers’. They are not just ‘wankers’, they are anti-democratic, treasonous, Britain hating, snobbish and dishonest wankers. The word ‘onanist’ is in my view not strong enough to describe the antics of the Remainer camp over the last few years or the increasing extremism of the Labour Party, an extremism that has been encouraged by Jeremy Corbyn.

Boris Johnson did nothing wrong here by what he said. My main criticisms are aimed at organs like Sky. They are engaging in fake news ‘couch-fainting’ over Mr Johnson’s robust language to describe a politican who scares the living daylights out of many of Britain’s subjects.

2 Comments on "What’s wrong with calling Corbyn a ‘wanker’?"

  1. Sheikh Anvakh | November 13, 2019 at 9:25 am |

    I’m not sure that “wanker” is a suitable epithet for Kommissar Corbyn, a humourless, a humourless, censorious, threatening, authoritarian, proto-despot in the mould of any number of his many blood-soaked Marxist “heroes”.

    I’d go so far as to say, that if the old fascist had had a good wank, he’d be rather less of a humourless, fascistic, authoritarian, dour, puritanical, Pali-cock-gobbling, vicious old bastard.

    Rarely have I despised someone so much, his despotic, menacing, authoritarian, jew-hating, terrorist cock-gobbling, threatening, scumbag of a deputy, Reichmarshal McDonnell is even worse.

    I’m rarely given to real hatred, but those two & those of the fascist-left have, as no supposed “right wing” group have ever managed in the UK, institutionalised & mainstreamed overt Jew hatred, together with Lansman’s Momentum Brownshirts and allied mosque-whipped Postal Vote Muslim Handshar SS Divisions.

    I am struggling for a suitable insult and their is really only one that, like a previous hard-left, Jew hating, Islam worshipping, anti-smoking, vegetarian, Socialit, fits hard left, Jew hating, Islam worshipping, anti-smoking, vegetarian, Corbyn, like a Saville row tailored suit and it’s tat off overused word, NAZI.

  2. Sheikh Anvakh | November 13, 2019 at 9:27 am |

    Apologies for the typos and the predictive text using their instead of there.

Comments are closed.