The terrorists who scream ‘allah hu akbar’ and the media outlets who ignore such shouts.

 

According to a short video that Tommy Robinson has put on his Parler account there has been yet another incident involving a mad Muslim threatening violence whilst holding a Koran and a knife. The incident allegedly happened in Paris, France yesterday and the Islamic savage was as far as I can see, subdued by the police with no injuries to innocent people.

The video below is undated and unsigned but I have no reason do doubt Mr Robinson’s description of the incident although a search for confirmation just brings up a great long list of all the other times Islamic Bearded Savages have brought violence to France or threatened violence. There are that many attacks or attempted attacks by Muslims in France that it is becoming difficult to keep up with them all.

Please note that the video below is NFSW as it shows, when the allah hu akbar-ing savage is rolled over by the police, this savage’s teeny tiny weeny. If anybody has got more information on this latest exhibition of a French Muslim going ‘full Islam’ then please let me know.

On the subject of Islam’s greatest and most feared and hated catchphrase, allah hu akbar, it appears that the BBC has been editing this phrase out of its World Service broadcasts. The BBC, no doubt eager to crawl up the arses of Islamic leaders and pandjandrums, refused to use the infamous Islamic catchphrase in a World Service report on the recent Nice attack. The BBC substituted the English language phrase ‘God is greatest’ for the Arabic terror catchphrase of ‘allah hu akbar’. Now why would they do that is a question I ask and it is also a question asked by the commentator Stephen Crowder from the USA. He remarked in the video below about how the BBC skirted around the issue of the stabby savage shouting out ‘allah hu akbar’.

Insert video here

It’s almost as if the BBC is trying to hide something about these terror attacks and hide the motivation or them isn’t it?

3 Comments on "The terrorists who scream ‘allah hu akbar’ and the media outlets who ignore such shouts."

  1. And on BBC radio 4 “Sunday” today we had three people discussing the attacks in France, namely John Laurenson, Nabila Ramdani and Dorian Jones.
    And (surprise, surprise) Ramdani started peddling out the tropes:
    1. The Muslims are the REAL victims here (of Macron’s language and attitudes).
    2. It’s all the fault of the WEST, (or in this case France) because they show “disrespect” to Islam (Oh the irony!) and have double standards.
    3. It’s only a tiny minority of Muslims who are terrorists.
    4. Muslims are discriminated against in Europe (so no wonder they become violent).

    And (surprise, surprise) none of the others really challenged her, though John Laurenson did try a bit, but Ramdani simply ignored him.

    VICTIMS: So once again we have a Muslim equating nasty words on Twatter, Farcebook etc. and the odd Hijab-tug or verbal insult with the mass-murder of non-Muslims by Muslims (but then again, why not, the Koran declares that non-Muslims are the lowest of the low, the vilest of animals etc., so the least affront to a Muslim is obviously infinitely worse than the murder of a mere “microbe”).

    The west is to blame, of course, because it “provokes” Muslims with cartoons, “aggressive” language etc. But it isn’t “provocative” for Muslim leaders to insult western countries, Muslim clerics to call Jews and Christians vile names, Muslims to chant “death to [insert western Country of the moment]”, to openly call for the beheading of those who offend them, or just Jews and Christians generally. There is, of course, no fault to be laid at their door whatsoever.

    It is only a “tiny minority” of Muslims who are active jihadists, but once you take account of their enables and supporters and mouthpieces (such as Ramdani) then that minority isn’t small at all and may well be not a minority at all when considering all global Muslim population.

    In Muslim Countries which have not (yet) exterminated their non-Muslim populations it is fine to kill non-Muslims who “offend”, to kidnap, rape and forcible convert non-Muslim girls, to limit the opportunities of non-Muslims to the most unpleasant jobs (sometimes by law as well as custom), to insist that a non-Muslim business MUST have a Muslim partner (who does nothing but take “Jizya” in a nice salary); I could go on, but I’m sure that gives you the flavour. Whereas the “oppressed” Muslims in the West are freely able to pursue careers as doctors, lawyers and members of the government and, indeed, any career they like.
    There are, of course, no double standards on display here by Ramdani either.

    And (surprise, surprise) none of the others on the panel made any points such as those above. After all that would just show them to be racist, Islamophobic bigots of the first water – and end their BBC careers.

  2. BBC Silent on World Wide French Embassy Protests about “islamophobic Macron”

    BBC: France Face Far Right Backlash After Mostly Peaceful Beheadings

    Says it all:

    We lack Macron’s courage to call this savagery what it is: Islamist terrorism
    Rod Liddle, Sunday November 01 2020, 12.01am, The Sunday Times

    Three people murdered in a Catholic church in Nice. One woman beheaded, two other people knifed to death by a man screaming “Allahu Akbar” (“God is great”). Sky News reported that the local police were attempting to discover a motive for the killings. I hope they have their best men on the job, because it’s a really tricky one, isn’t it?
    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/we-lack-macrons-courage-to-call-this-savagery-what-it-is-islamist-terrorism-gbcsj265m

    Andrew Neil
    youtu.be/GoaPJkA9GmE?t=1476

    @Jon MC
    Good piece, agree

    Years of surveys (from 9/11 on) of RoPs after RoPs murdering others has shown the “Tiny Minority” of 25% to 55% supported the attack – Taqiya, how many more didn’t tell truth

Comments are closed.