The current Labour government has nothing left. It has no money, no clue how to make things better, a falling audience for its propaganda outlets such as the BBC, no loyalty to the people of Britain and dwindling public support. All it has left to sustain its existence is violence against the people and violence in the service of bringing into Britain criminal invaders.
This is what we are learning from recent protest activity Gosport in Hampshire. The Government mounted a massive police action to stop local people from protesting about the landing of invaders in the area. According to Dr Richard North at the Turbulent Times blog, which I’ve linked to below, the Government flooded Gosport with police including some from the Metropolitan Police’s Territorial Support Group, the Met’s public order head bashers. For the Government to deprive London, at a time of tension and potential violence from the Pally-wankers, of what may be a significant chunk of the Met’s public order policing capacity, just to protect invaders who have no right to be here and to stop Britons complaining about the invaders shows us whose side the Government is on and it isn’t ours.
Enormous triple axle coaches, hundreds of police, at least four ambulances and the deployment of all manner of oppressive laws to prevent protest have all been present or used in Gosport. They’ve been used to welcome those who should never be in Britain and to frustrate protests by British people who’ve had enough of Britain’s great migration disaster. The problems that the invaders and the Government’s pandering to them bring does not end at Gosport, it ends in villages, towns and cities across the UK where these invaders will be scattered and dumped, suffering from the sex crimes, property crime, anti-social behaviour and increased burden on public services that these invaders bring.
The people have at election after election pleaded with politicians to deal with the problems caused by mass levels of inappropriate types of migration. But we’ve been crying in the wilderness and successive governments have heard the cries of Britons whose areas have been turned into dangerous shitholes by bad forms of migration and ignored them. These governments have made the migration problems infinitely worse whilst in office worse than they were even 15 years ago and they were really bad then.
Dr North said:
“The inability or unwillingness of the government to “stop the boats” represents a massive failure of the state which remains inexplicable to ordinary people who have to suffer the consequences.
Time and again, there have been calls to stop this illegal flow. Yet it continues, despite being electorally harmful to the governing party and having a knock-on effect in building hostility towards politicians and distrust of the police. The latter are now seen more as uniformed thugs serving the state, rather than protectors of the people.”
Spot on there Dr North. I agree that the failure to protect Britain’s borders is a prime example of state failure. Acquiescing to an invasion is one of those things that a properly functioning state should class as a ‘never should happen’ level of events. Sadly in Britain this sort of ‘never should happen’ event are now everyday ones. As Dr North said it’s never the Establishment who suffer from the ill-effects of migration. It’s ordinary people who have to live with stabby Sudanese or rapey Rwandans or a propagandised and prone to violence ‘Palestinians’ living next door or near to their children’s schools. It’s ordinary Britons who have to suffer that. The way that this and some previous governments have treated migration is to slap Britons in the face with it and to tell those who are bereaved, bleeding or violated or frightened because of the actions of these imported creatures, to just ‘shut up and enjoy the diversity’.
I also agree with Dr North’s assessment that the political classes are now increasingly the target of public hostility and that hostility has been justifiably earned. As for the police they’ve been so politicised since the mid 1990’s that they have long lost any semblance of an entity that polices with impartiality. They are, as Dr North said, being seen more as the state’s uniformed thugs instead of a force to protect all of us. That attitude from the public hardens even more when we see the copious examples of two tier policing that the last decade or more has given us.
The State is obviously frightened about the current situation. The are responding as all tyrants do with oppression of the people and the suppression of dissent. The arrest and imprisonment on remand of the anti-invasion activist Danny Tommo and the hundreds of arrests per year for ‘speech crimes’ of those who speak up against the Government’s narratives is evidence of that fear. As I said in a previous article on the Government’s only weapon now being the oppression of the people, which can be found via the link below, the government are acting in ‘the only way they know how’.
If you can measure the success of a policy against a political grouping by seeing that it is mortally wounded or going away then the Government has not succeeded against Mr Tommo’s ‘Patriot Platform’ group. According to Dr North the Patriot Platform entity seems to have garnered a whole lot more support since the arrest of Mr Tommo. Patriot Platform can still get an enormous number of bodies out for publicity reasons something that backs up for me what Dr North has said.
As many of us have expected we are starting to see an escalation not just by the forces of the State but by those ranged against the State. We are starting to see, as I and others predicted new tactics or tactics not seen on mainland Britain but which have previously been only found in the British Province of Ulster. Protestors are deploying barricades, flimsy ones at first but which are likely to become more substantial in future protests and probably mobile ones manned by young people or women both. This will be done for optics purposes in order to produce images such as the police smashing a baton at the head of an unarmed woman or a teenager, images that will further enrage the population, and to deliberately stretch police resources.
Dr North said in his piece that in Gosport we saw not only but building of barricades but also protestors scattering nails in certain roadways. Maybe this was done in the hope that it impedes the ability of the forces of oppression, in this case the police, to move around. Now as a former public disorder photographer I’ve seen all sorts of shit go down at demos that have turned violent. I’ve seen trucks turned over, fires, the throwing of stones and other items, the police behaving like violent animals and protestors doing the same, but rarely have I seen tactical and systematic area denial actions like the nail scattering at mainland British violent events. I did not see everything that went on in large and violent crowds back then but none of my colleagues who were doing a similar job reported to me that this tactic was being used. The area denial attempts by British people frustrated by the Government and oppressed by them are an escalation but they are an escalation that comes as a response to police going in hard on what are now are not hard core political activists but are just ordinary Britons who’ve had enough.
I find it difficult not to agree with much of what Dr North said of the response to public anger about the constant invasion of wrong’uns from the Home Secretary.
Dr North added:
“Home secretary Mahmood’s reported response to the events in Gosport, though, is appalling. She says the “far right balaclava-wearing men should sod off”, adding: “They’d kill me in a minute if they could, and they’d definitely kick me out of my own country. They don’t think I’m a true Brit”.
Of course, the Muslim lady of Kashmiri origin is not a “true Brit”, although she also claims to be an Englishwoman – which she most decidedly is not. But we don’t want to kill her – we’ll leave such barbaric practices to her countrymen, who have had plenty of recent practice.
If what she has said is correctly quoted, it is extraordinarily tone deaf. There were no “balaclava-wearing men” in Gosport. Her hired thugs made sure of that. Instead, the streets were filled with ordinary men and women, concerned at the effects of giving free passage to third-world retards into their communities. These were the people she is telling to “sod off”.”
Dr North is correct, Ms Mahmood’s response is appalling. It’s dishonest, emotive, dripping with whining and shows that she has no knowledge or care about what things are like for ordinary Britons. It’s dishonest and emotive to claim that the protesters in Gosport, who are by now overwhelmingly ordinary people and not activists, want to kill her or are part of the ‘far right’. As Dr North pointed out it’s not Britons who behave like savages to female politicians, it’s places like where Ms Mahmood’s heritage lies. I agree with Dr North over the tone deafness of what Ms Mahmood is alleged to have said.
It’s clear that what’s happening in Gosport and places like this is not the work of the real far right. I’ve observed this particular current, the real far right, for years and they do not have the bodies, nor the finances nor the organisational ability to pull off the sort of protests we’ve seen in Gosport and the sort of protests which are likely to spread. This is ordinary people, those who have taken shit for decades from successive UK governments over the state of the economy and of public services and especially over the issue of migration, deciding that they’ve got nothing to lose now and are getting out on the streets.
A sensible and thoughtful politician in the role of Home Secretary would have realised that no existing and identifiably ‘far right’ entity would be able to get so many people standing with them and maybe amend government policy to placate the justifiably angry Britons. But what we have in the Home Secretary’s chair at present is not a thoughtful and sensible politician, it’s Shabana Mahmood, a brittle, emotive and greasy pole climbing creature who has shown she does not give a toss about ordinary people and sees them as targets to shit upon. She did not intervene in an intelligent manner she intervened to vent, to lie and to disparage the very people who are being harmed by her own government’s policies.
We are now at the point where the times in Britain gets ‘interesting’. We’ve now got a political class that is despised as are the State’s enforcement organs and a growing public realisation that they’ve tried the ballot box method to solve their problems but they’ve still been ignored by the political classes. People voted Tory for economic reasons and to control immigration but the Tories failed on the economy, saddled Britain with the lunacy of Net Zero and very importantly opened up the country’s borders to the dross of the world and left the ordinary people of Britain to pick up the pieces of their failures. People voted Labour to make things better in 1997 and in 2024 for ordinary people only to see Labour increase the power of the State to suppress dissent, engage in divisive and anti-indigenous identity politics, pander to one religion above all others and allow an invasion of wrong’uns. As well as voting for their lives to be improved the people have also at election after election voted for various parties who made promises to reduce migration levels. Every single one of those migration promises has been broken and the price has been paid for by ordinary British people who are taxed into penury to pay for migration, who are forced to use public services that are damaged by migration due to excessive demands on them or now work primarily in the interests of migrants and who have to live with the crime, violence and fear that these incomers bring.
I didn’t want any of what I am seeing these days. I did not want the street politics we are getting as I feared where it could lead. I wanted to see Britain’s numerous problems solved via the ballot box. But the cries of Britons at the ballot box for controls on migration and a repair of the damage done by it have been ignored and when democratic process is ignored you end up with street politics and this is where we are today.
The blame for this whole situation, the protests, the oppressive laws, the criminalisation of speech that challenges government narratives, the fighting in the streets and the cohorts of rapine savagery that have been plucked from the English Channel and dumped on unsuspecting Britons, is not on the British people. We voted for parties that promised to protect us but instead we got governments that imported and protected invaders. We were let down and is it any wonder that we now have a large cohort of Britons who have lost trust in electoral politics and have taken to the street? If Shabana Mahmood and all the other politicians who have failed us are looking for blame for the increase in unrest and distrust in government and the police then she and they only need to look in a mirror. We’ve got street politics because the political class has failed us and we must never let this class forget that.
Link
Dr Richard North’s piece on the Gosport protests
https://www.turbulenttimes.co.uk/news/front-page/immigration-fish-in-the-sea/
Be the first to comment on "Gosport – We can all now see whose side the Government is on and it’s not ours."