An interesting snippet of information has been sent to me by one of my contacts in the county of Herefordshire. It takes the form of an article in the Hereford Times about the resettlement of alleged ‘Syrian’ ‘refugees’ in the county. The Home Office, by which I mean you and I the taxpayer, is having to stump up £540,000 to give to Herefordshire council in order to support the ‘complex needs’ of these alleged ‘Syrian’ ‘refugees’. The Hereford Times played the usual and dishonest I might add, ‘poor children’ line in the story, even though the majority of those posing as ‘Syrian refugees’ are Muslim males of military age, the very last people that any civilised country should take in.

Here’s the Hereford Times story on how ‘Syrian refugees’ (who are just as likely to be bog standard Muslim rapists, criminals and jihadists by the way) are about to be dumped on the county. What is interesting about this story is not the standard ‘vulnerable refugees’ guff from the journalist who wrote the story, Paul Broome, but the comments. The comments (as of 08:00 BST today) are overwhelmingly hostile to the idea of Herefordshire being a dumping ground for these people. One of the commentators also queried why support for vulnerable ‘Syrian refugees’ was being dished out whilst similar services for Britons are being withdrawn to save money. There are of course the odd one or two ‘refugees welcome’ lunatics in the comment thread, but they appear to be in the minority of commentators. It is to be expected that, as is usual with stories that involve immigration or Islam, the comments will suddenly disappear as the editoral staff have a fit of the collective politically correct vapours and shutdown comments. As is usual policy for this blog, the original text of the Hereford Times story is in italics, whereas this blog’s comments are in plain text.

The Hereford Times said:

HEREFORDSHIRE will take in up to 60 Syrian refugees from this September.

People who are going to be affected by this decision have a right to be concerned, especially as we’ve seen the appalling behaviour of these ‘refugees’ elsewhere in Europe. The proportion of criminals, rapists, jihadis and other anti-socials is very high with these ‘refugees’.

The Minister for Syrian Refugees, Richard Harrington, has approved Herefordshire Council‘s offer which will see about 18 families resettle here from the war-torn Middle-Eastern country.

18 sounds like the sort of suspiciously low number pumped out by politicians in order to convince local people that this area will not be swamped by the sort of Islamic invaders who have almost completely destroyed the existing cultures in places like Newham, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest in East London, Bradford, Rochdale, Rotherham etc. I doubt that this number will remain at 18. This number is so low as could be reasonably considered as BS. The question has been raised, not just in the comments but elsewhere in other media that just because the Arab nations refuse to take these people do not mean that we in Britain have to. If the Arabs don’t want them for economic and security reasons, what conceivable benefit will they bring to the United Kingdom?

The council’s Cabinet will now meet next Monday (9th) to agree the commissioning of a procurement process to set-up a support service for the refugees once they arrive here.

The two-year service would be provided at a value “not exceeding £540,000”.

this funding will be provided by the Home Office.

The people in the area need to start getting angry about this. Over half a million pounds of taxpayers money is going to be spent, not on the existing residents who are currently labouring under cuts to services, but on those who may not be any good for Britian in the long run. This is plainly unjust. Also we need to look at who we are taking in. Are we taking in the members of the oppressed class of Syrian or are we taking in the oppressor class? I’ve no moral objection to taking Christian refugees, or ex Muslims or other non-Muslims, they are the genuinely oppressed. However, there is the strong likelihood that Britain will be taking in a large number of Muslims who are the oppressor class. To those who naively say ‘how could you turn away a child just because he’s called Mohammed’, then I’d ask them to consider this fact. Little Mohammed’s grow up into big Mohammed’s and we’ve all seen the sort of trouble that the big Mohammed’s are causing all around Europe haven’t we?

In background papers released ahead of the Hereford Shirehall meeting, the council says the refugees coming to Herefordshire will be brought directly from camps and informal settlements around the Syrian borders. To be considered they must meet at least one of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR)’s seven vulnerability criteria.

Who trusts the Government to accurately vet these people properly? I don’t. Also only taking one of the UN criteria makes it all the more likely that people

“This means that people will generally be children and women at risk, survivors of torture or violence, disabled people or those with significant health needs,” the council says.

“They will all come in family groups and children will be around half of the cohort. Approximately 20 per cent or 12 refugees are likely to have complex needs in relation to health, social care or education.

Note the ‘tugging of the heartstrings’ comment here from the council spokesperson. There’s no indication about how much checking is going into the stories that these alleged ‘Syrian refugees’ are telling UK government staff. I do hope that along with the UN criteria these people are being checked for crime and jihad connections, after all ISIS told us they were going to embed jihadists among these ‘refugees’. What’s also pertinent is that these people are going to have to supported by significant amounts of taxpayer cash over a long period if not forever. This does beg the question, if there is taxpayer cash to fund the dumping and support of ‘Syrian refugees’ on Herefordshire, why isn’t their taxpayer case to fund stuff that those who pay taxes in the county actually want? As one commentator, Randombloke, said to the newspaper:

At least 20 % will have complex needs..
Is this the same complex needs that are being withdrawn from our own people who have lived here all their lives and paid taxes at some time or other…
Isnt it great how they can find housing and social needs for anyone but our own…
Plus what happens after 2 years when the governments money stops..does the help and social care stop to..or do we have to subsides these people for the rest of their lives as again our own people get turned away and left to suffer on the streets..
What a shocking way to treat your own people..
Tou do gooder tree hugging lefties should hang your heads in shame..

Some very good points there Mr Randombloke. Why is money always avalable for foreign freeloaders and the targets of middle class Leftie virtue signalling but never it seems to help our own people?

“As far as possible, the Home Office will match people from rural parts of Syria to areas like Herefordshire. This may mean that a smaller proportion of refugees can speak English as this appears to be less common in rural areas.”

The needs of refugee families are expected to be varied with the authority promising to work with voluntary, community and faith organisations to finalise the sort of support services required.

The service will help the refugees find basic household equipment, access benefits, attend language classes for adults, and help registering with a GP and dentist, among other services.

More spending, more taxpayer cash down the drain on things like language tuition and bumping these ‘refugees’ up the lists for things like housing etc. It’s yet more unncessary pressure on the health, housing and the social and care services. In time, as has happened in a multitude of areas where followers of Islam have been settled, there will no doubt be other costs such policing the crime that they commit or dealing with the effects of misogynistic Islamic male sexuality.

The government has established a Syrian vulnerable persons’ resettlement programme to take 20,000 people from Syria and its borders over a five year period to enable them to settle in the UK.

We should take none at all. That would be the safer option for all of us. But, if we are to take any at all, then it should only be the Christians or the atheists or other similar people oppressed by Islam. What we should not be taking in are anymore of the followers of Islam. Britain has enough problems as it is with the followers of that accursed ideology called Islam. This including not only general property crime, violent crime and jihad, but also encompasses such horrors as the mass rape of thousands of British girls by Islamic Grooming Gangs in places like Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, Newcastle, Halifax etc.

It’s right to feel compassionate for others but that feeling of compassion should not override the need to keep our country, and our communities, secure from the depredations of Islam. I predict that no good will come of this and similar decisions that are led by emotions instead of basing these decisions considerations of practicality and long term security. These people should have been helped closer to where they originated from and not brought here where they will eat up resources like no tomorrow and probably end up being even more of a problem as time goes by.

Good luck with your ‘Syrian’ jihadist, rapists, criminals and ponces, Herefordshire, you are going to need it.

Link

Original story from Hereford Times

http://www.herefordtimes.com/news/14469219.Support_service_for_Syrian_refugees_to_be_debated_by_Herefordshire_Council_s_Cabinet/?ref=ebln#comments-anchor

Comments complete as of 08:00 BST 5^th May 2016

Sign in or Register to leave a comment and/or receive comment alerts.