This is why they are called ‘Filth’ – Part one

 

Back when I was growing up. There was a considerable degree of respect for the police. Most people among those my working class parents consorted with, treated the police as valuable public servants who kept the streets safe for the law abiding members of the public. Of course there were nicknames for the police, but they were relatively benign, ‘old bill’, ‘coppers’ and similar names were the order of the day. But, as I recall, it was only the criminal fraternity where I grew up who called the police ‘filth’.

It was the criminals whose ‘businesses’ relied on the police being out of the way or unaware of their activities who used the degrading term of ‘filth’ for the police. I might have been a bit of a terror during my teenage years playing around in abandoned buildings and giving the police a bit of a runaround, but it never occurred to me to refer to the police as ‘filth’, even then and as I was, this was for me a step too far. ‘Filth’ was a word that criminals used and I might have been a bit of an arsehole at the time but I was not a criminal. Back then I recognised, as I do now, that civilised nations need effective, honest and civilised police forces and that those who worked in the police deserved more respect than to be called ‘filth’. For a while I dated a policeman’s daughter and worked for a police trade magazine when I freelanced as a photographer. In addition I had close relationships with police officers, including unformed officers and members of CID when I was a court reporter. I had enough personal connections with various police forces to be uneasy of calling members of police forces ‘filth’ and using the term sparingly such as when police have been blatantly dodgy as they were for example over the Rotherham rape epidemic. But that was then. Now things are very different.

Now things, or rather the police have changed. Instead of being the people that we the people call on when we are in trouble or when crime is occurring or as a presence that deters crime, which was what the founder of the modern police Sir Robert Peel intended them to be, they are now too often seen as bent political enforcers. Because of that and how with the introduction of ‘hate speech’ offences which has criminalised opinions and therefore turned every British subject into a potential criminal along with the now obvious political bias of the police’s, I’m hearing more and more people, people who are not criminals but ostensibly law abiding British subjects, refer to the police as ‘filth’.

Whenever someone is arrested for some crass comment on Facebook or where, as with the Islamic Rape Gang issue, the police take the side of the offenders rather than the offended against, or when police kneel to the Marxist thugs of BLM or police demonstrations with an obviously biased manner, more normal law abiding Britons feel more and more comfortable with referring to the police as ‘filth’. This is not as it should be. We should be able to respect the police enough to not call them filth but we can’t as long as the police are seen as the enforcement arm of the political Left or are lazy or arrogant or, as in the case of Wayne Couzens, just plain scum.

I read a recent article from the comedy writer Graham Linehan which focused on how deeply and completely the police had been penetrated by the extremes of the biology denying ‘cult of Trans’. The image below comes from Mr Linehan’s article and shows police officers gathering en masse and displaying the new inclusive but divisive Pride flag a flag that prioritises Trans over everything else. Seeing police officers, who should be policing with impeccable equity and impartiality flying a trans flag and kow towing to the cult of trans absolutely disgusts me and I believe that images like this and Mr Linehan’s comments below will cause yet more Britons to withdraw their support for the police and refer to them as ‘filth’. After all how can any reasonable person support a force that has thrown its lot in with a tiny minority of extremists and whilst doing so chuck the rights of natal women under the proverbial bus? I’m reasonable or at least I consider myself to be so, but I can’t support this, it stinks to high heaven.

Graham Linehan said:

I want to point something out.

That’s three times now that I have been visited by police for standing up for the rights of women and children.

Marion Millar is currently awaiting trial for standing up for the rights of women and children.

A serving police officer smeared Posie Parker because she stands up for the rights of women and children.

The police tried to jail a transwoman because he* stood up for the rights of women and children.

At the same time, the police have very publicly aligned themselves with a group who try to frighten women enough that they won’t defend their own rights, a group that has inserted itself into the LGB flag using the grimly appropriate shape of a dividing, divisive triangle.

I would advise readers to follow the links given in Mr Linehan’s piece as they show how deeply the police have been corrupted by the Cult of Trans.

Mr Linehan then went on to mention the police officer who murdered Sarah Everard and how the police’s decision to involve themselves with the ‘deeply corrupt and corrupting’ gender identity movement and the cult of trans was an over correction following the results of the Stephen Lawrence enquiry. To a certain extent I agree with this position. The Lawrence enquiry floored the police when they were described as ‘institutionally racist’ but rather than do what they should have done and correct the internal racism of police forces whilst maintaining a high quality, effective and impartial policing service, police forces instead opened their doors to every and all minority groups and allowed them undue influence over policing. This has had the result that all too often the police are now the armed enforcement arm of a highly misogynistic trans lobby.

Mr Linehan added:

Currently, the police are aligned with an ideology whose footsoldiers openly tried to destroy both JK Rowling, a survivor of domestic abuse, and Rosie Duffield, another survivor of domestic abuse. They are aligned with a woman facing the second-longest fitness to practice hearing after Andrew Wakefield. They are aligned with people who blow whistles to drown out the words of feminists. They are aligned with psychotic trolls who have turned cruelty into a hobby.

Again, I advise you to please follow Mr Linehan’s links to see how horrible the trans activists have become and how deeply the state and entities like the police have capitulated to them. As regards the issue of transsexuals, I have some degree of sympathy for them. They are a tiny number of people who choose to commit to a lifetime of medication and radical surgery not because they are attention seekers or women haters in drag but because they are tormented by the disparity between their bodies and their own self image. There’s a massive difference between those who I would call the quiet and respectful transsexuals who are out there and the trans activists or those who are adherents to the cult of trans. It’s the activists and the trans cultists who are threatening women, trying to erase women from life and from the public world and having an undue and unwanted influence on the way that we are policed.

Without a shadow of a doubt, the police have lost the respect of the public and more importantly they’ve lost the respect of women. It is the police’s job to win that respect back from women. Mr Linehan said of this loss of trust Women need to know they can stand up for their rights without being targeted and abused.

Most of all, women need assurances that they won’t find themselves in handcuffs because they refused to curtsey to a man in a dress. “ I see little to disagree with about that comment.

It’s behaviour like this by the police, acting as the thuggish enforcers of the cult of trans that push more and more ordinary people to refer to them as ‘filth’. If the police don’t want to suffer this level of opprobrium from the public or to have trust in them rebuilt, then they need to be seen to support those who they are currently crapping on, such as women and to stop being influenced by dangerous and divisive minority cults such as the cult of trans.

 

Part two of this article can be found HERE

 

1 Comment on "This is why they are called ‘Filth’ – Part one"

  1. what you said about policing in your youth struck a cord with me too.
    Back when I was a lad I knew the local Bobby (a man-mountain called John Edwards). He was the local beat officer and he lived in the community he policed (that was real community policing, not the modern version, A “community liaison CPSO” or some such).
    How right you are about how far the Police have fallen from impartially upholding the law to policing “right-think”.

Comments are closed.