Britain is, despite its categorisation by trans activists as being ‘Terf Island’, one of those nations where the ludicrous and fact free Cult of Trans has managed to garner itself a significant amount of undue and unwanted influence over politics and public services. This cult has managed to push its deranged idea that a person’s ‘gender identity’ takes precedence over every other consideration into almost every aspect of public life. The cult of trans, or ‘Troonery’ as I prefer to call it, a neo-word that combines the word ‘Trans’ and ‘Loon’, is everywhere. It’s in our children’s schools, in higher education, in the Church of England, in the civil service, in the NHS, local government, national government and in many of our political parties.
On the subject of political parties, one of those that has been the most severely afflicted by aligning itself to Troonery has been the Green Party. This is to be somewhat expected as the Greens are often associated with policies that are unrealistic and destructive. However the lengths that the Greens will go to promote or defend the cult of Trans continue to amaze me.
A good example of how the Greens have been thoroughly captured by the Cult of Trans can be found in their candidate for Bromsgrove a troon who calls himself Mellisa Poulton. The Greens have been promoting Poulton as a ‘woman’ but to anyone with functioning eyes and ears this is clearly a bloke in a wig.
When Poulton did his big reveal on social media about his candidacy for the Greens in Bromsgrove, he may, because of possible narcissism, expected to be praised and called ‘stunning and brave’, but he failed to take into account that the rest of us have eyes and can see that he’s little more than a bloke in a wig pretending to be a woman. This Troon then got mercilessly and justly mocked by members of the Great British general public because of his delusion that he was a woman. The Greens in Bromsgrove then stepped in to defend Poulton, who had previously stood as a Conservative candidate under his real name of Matthew Viner. Neither this nor a subsequent appearance on the BBC where he was allowed to whine on about ‘transphobia’ and to attempt to cry bully his way into getting his own way, stopped those with eyes and a rudimentary knowledge of human biology, from seeing him as what he is, which is a man.
The intervention of a Tory MP, the Deputy Chair for Women Rachel Maclean, who called Poulton/Viner a ‘man in a wig’ also did little to help the cult of trans and its votaries from shutting down public expressions of contempt at Poulton/Viner’s attempt to pose as a woman. Because of Ms Maclean’s intervention and honest description of Poulton/Viner it was not long before the hashtag #BlokeInAWig started trending on Twitter/X.
The more I dig into the Poulton/Viner case the more disturbing it becomes. Some of the allegations circling around social media and some of the statements made by Poulton/Viner himself throw up an awful lot of red flags for me. Poulton/Viner in an election communication where he is talking about his background and interests states that he has an interest in helping ‘trans youth’. All I can say to that is that Poulton/Viner and those like him are the very last people who should be within a thousand miles of any young person who is struggling with body image or self image issues or who has been snagged by the trans cultists. This is not just a red flag to me but a whole field full of them.
Other allegations concern Poulton/Viner’s very public fetish life. Now I have normally very little issue with what people have as their fetishes, I’ve known enough BDSM’ers in my social and professional life to know that most people with a sexual fetish, whether that be bondage, submission, domination or similar will control it, sublimate it, keep it in appropriate places and times and avoid scenarios that are overtly morally dodgy such as age play. This is not the case when it comes to Poulton/Viner. There are a growing number of allegations floating around that Poulton/Viner has been all too public with fetishes that should arouse concern and that these fetishes are clearly not under control but are being manifested. These allegations concern Poulton/Viner being into stuff that is, in my view, psychologically dodgy such as forced feminisation and sissyfication. One social media user has found what they claim to be screenshots of Poulton/Viner liking other social media posts that relate to forced feminisation and sissification one of which features an image of a sissy man dressed in clothing that would be appropriate for a teenage girl. Another allegation about Poulton/Viner is that the name ‘Poulton’ is his ex wife’s maiden name. This means that not only has Poulton/Viner stolen a woman’s identity and probably a woman’s place on the candidates list but he’s also stolen his ex wife’s name.
Even if half the allegations circling out there are based in truth then it doesn’t show Poulton/Viner in a very good light. The allegations that this man either liked age play or was age play adjacent brings up for me a lot of the yuk factor. Not saying he’s a nonce or anything like that but it something that looks bad. I dare say that if Poulton/Viner was standing as his proper sex and with his proper name then after the revelations about his not so private private life a sensible party would have dropped him and the media would be having a field day with the allegations and the gossip about him. The fact that the Green Party and the media have not done this shows us two things. The first is that someone taking on a ‘trans’ identity still have a lot of the media on their side, trans is still a shield against accountability for dodgy men in public life. The second thing is that the Greens have obviously learned nothing from the Aimee Challoner affair where party initially did nothing when a trans identified male, Aimee Challoner, appointed his father as his election agent even though the father was on bail awaiting trial on horrific child sex abuse charges.
After the Challoner Affair the Greens should have been a lot more proactive in sniffing out candidates who had private lives that raised red flags but it’s clear from the Greens selection of Poulton/Viner that not only are they not doing this ( Poulton/Viner’s interests were not hard for members of the public to find) but they are willing to defend the transgender cult to the maximum of their ability. There are a whole host of reasons not to vote for the Greens but failing to prevent someone like Poulton/Viner becoming a candidate must surely rank high in a list of those reasons.
