Guest Post – Relations between Christians and Jews in medieval England was not what you might expect.

 

There is somewhat of a standard history of Jews in England in the 13th century and it goes like this: Jew-hating Kings and Queens forced Jews to live in certain places and only have particular careers such as moneylending, which made the Jews unpopular with the broader population. Then, because King Edward I had spent so much money fighting the Welsh, he expelled England’s Jews in 1290 and took their money. Much of that statement is true, Jews were concentrated in places like London and Hereford and then ultimately expelled from England, but that’s not the whole story. There is a great deal more nuance and greyness about it. Whilst not wanting to excuse the crimes of Edward I (the Scots and the Welsh have their own reasons to dislike Edward I) the story of the Christians and Jews and their relations in places like Hereford was not just a case of Christians hating Jews for theological and financial reasons and then the Jews got kicked out. It turns out that relations between ordinary Christians and Jews, not the elite of England of course, but the ordinary Englishmen and women, were not as hostile as we might like to think.

Today’s guest post is from an author whose work has been widely published but which is being published under the pseudonym of ‘BlackCat’ for their own personal reasons, which I respect. It’s an account of a lecture given at Hereford Cathedral last year on the subject of the Jews of medieval Hereford. The author has written before on Jewish information sources and in particular the theology and practises of Britain’s non-Orthodox Jewish community.

This is a great look at an often overlooked aspect of relationships between Christians and Jews in medieval England which shows that there was a distinct class difference between those in the ruling elite both administrative and religious and the ordinary people in how Jews were seen at that time. There was also a willingness for Jewish traders to break Jewish Sabbath rules and trade on a Saturday because that was the main day that the non-Jewish traders operated. It appears that there was a willingness by members of both communities, Christian and Jewish, to set aside religious rules when there was something of mutual benefit to be had. This meant that Jews would trade on their Sabbath whilst the ordinary Christians set aside Christian religious Jew hatred and made use of the Jews trade contacts to get goods that they might otherwise not have been able to access. It appears that outside of the elite in government and the church, relations between Christian and Jew were not as hostile as we might be led to believe.

Here’s the piece by today’s guest post author.

“Medieval Jewish history of Hereford

Hereford Cathedral hosted this talk for the 750th anniversary of the arrival in Hereford of Jews from Worcester and Gloucester. Sadly this was because they had been expelled from those places, and it was not many years later that Jews were expelled from the whole of England and one of the themes of the talk was to find out why this happened. The talk was given by Dr Dean Irwin, a visiting Fellow at the University of Lincoln and Dr Luke Devine, of the University of Worcester, in memory of Joe Hillaby, a pioneer of research and writing on Anglo-Jewry in medieval times. I was concerned that this was a very niche subject for Hereford and only a few people would be there, in fact about 130 people came to the Woolhope Room at the Cathedral. Joe Hillaby was the President of the Woolhope Club for over 40 years, until 2013, so this was a fitting location and we were pleased to be joined by members of Joe’s family.

One reason given for the hostility towards Jews before the Expulsion was that they were extensively involved in usury, lending money at high rates of interest, because Christians were not allowed to do that. In fact records show that only 1% of the Jewish community was involved in usury, Joe traced the movement from moneylending into trade. He showed 53% of transactions took place on a Saturday, including the Easter Fair and the Feast of St Denis, because these were good times to see people. The scholar Rev DrJames Parkes reckoned that in medieval times there may have been a community of around 5000 or more Jewish people in Hereford, with a mikvah and a cemetery and there was a pragmatic relationship between the Jews and the Christians.

In general, Jews and Christians were subject to the same laws, so they had to get on. One amusing story is of a spectacular marriage in 1286 where Jews and Christians celebrated together, to the great displeasure of the Bishop who was concerned that the ceremony would disparage the Christian faith and preach heresies. He told Christians not to attend, but they went anyway. He excommunicated them and called them children of wickedness and rebellion. A letter tells that they ate, drank, played, joked and played sports together, delighted to humiliate their Bishop by living happily as neighbours. The feast following the marriage is being researched by Natashsa Jenman of the University of Trier, looking at the circumstances and the interactions between the Jews and Christians.

Another reason for antisemitism was the stigmatisation of Jews as greedy, filthy, diabolical and even ritual murderers. Joe Hillaby traced the ritual child murder accusation to its dissemination by Harold of Gloucester, though it started with the death of William of Norwich in 1144.

The Jews were subject to payment of a toll of £40 a year, wealthy families paid most of it, the whole community could be imprisoned if it was not paid. Even then, they knew we are all responsible for each other, as we remind ourselves at Yom Kippur. I am pleased to say that a new generation of researchers are continuing with this work, one is mapping Christian and Jewish communities across England and there was a further lecture in January 2026 on the 1290 expulsion. The lecture was followed by a lively question and answer session, asking such things as where did the English Jews come from and where did they go when they left England? The answer was they came from Rouen and Mainz, to places like Bristol, Oxford and Lincoln. They were given 3 months to leave and safe passage to France and Morocco.

I was surprised to find that records of the period are quite wide-ranging, for example, there is a Charter in the Cathedral Archives showing the houses where the Jews used to live.  Other records are on pipe rolls, court records, letters and even Hereford’s Mappa Mundi which has antisemitic imagery and was the subject of a future lecture. Currently there is no memorial to the Jews of Hereford, Joe advocated for a plaque and there will be a book type of memorial.”

I’m delighted to be able to present this guest post and it is to be hoped that the continuing researches by academics who specialise in the subject of Anglo-Jewry will uncover more about the fascinating subject of Jews in England prior to the 1290 expulsion.

7 Comments on "Guest Post – Relations between Christians and Jews in medieval England was not what you might expect."

  1. Meanwhile the markers for the silver stolen by threats, force, torture and murder from the Jews of England for the ransom of Richard the Lionheart reside in the Tower of London and never repaid.
    Time, as a community to demand repayment at a very generous cumulative compounded rate of 1% over 834 years, should be a tidy sum and pay for the over 500 years of expulsion with barely the shirts on our backs.
    The idea that this was a general taxation on the whole population was ludicrous. They went after the wealthy merchants who kept the economy afloat.
    Time for repayment.
    5000 marks from the Jews towards the ransom, more than three times the contribution of the City of London. Later on, in 1210, King John imposed a “Bristol Tallage” of 66,000 marks, which was enforced by imprisonment and torture.

    Those markets reside in the Tower of London, time to pay us back, it would be tens of billions in current terms. A Mark was not a coin but was a weight of between 230-234 grams.

    Yep, time for repayment at today’s value,
    Note that these are NOT “reparations”, this is REPAYMENT pure and simple.

    Considering the constant calls for “reparations”, this is a far more logical and moral matter.

    As of today Silver is about £1.90 per gram, multiplied by 230 x 71000 (both expropriations combined) should equal £31,027,000 calculated at a very reasonable 1% compound interest rate, should return to us as descendants of those Jews, a trifling £125 BILLION.

    Time to petition the King for repayment.

    • Fahrenheit211 | April 20, 2026 at 2:14 pm | Reply

      I’d settle for the authorities dealing justly harshly with the imported Jew haters and maybe a bit of thanks for Oliver Cromwell for letting the Jews back into England again.

      • Cromwell didn’t allow us Jews back into England because he loved Jews.
        He let us back because the country was flat broke with a broken economy and no economically sound mercantile Jews to build it again.
        You only have to look at the prosperity of places like Antwerp and other European areas in comparison to bankrupt judenrein England.
        Cromwell if nothing else, was a pragmatist and realised that the country was on its economic less and its arse hanging out of its collective trousers.

        • Fahrenheit211 | April 20, 2026 at 2:38 pm | Reply

          Cromwell also let Jews back because his theological views made him believe that it was necessary theologically for the Jews to be readmitted to England. However you are correct in saying that England was in a bad place economically as well as politically due to the rule of the Puritans. The Restoration came as a relief for many Britons. This is why I say to republicans when they spout on about abolishing the monarchy ‘we tried that and it didn’t work’.

      • Not going to happen. Either too scared of being called phobic or waaaaaycist and the attendant threats of violence or for the politicians, anxious to hold on to those corrupt unverifiable mosque-whipped mass Muslim monoculture postal votes that keep them in their seats.

  2. Here’s a cut and paste of the conversation with copilot about this. It makes interesting reading. AI is useful, but only if you ask the right questions.

    “Once you strip away the mathematical theatrics and get the compounding right, the historical scale of the extraction itself remains the core of the argument — and it’s enormous by any reasonable standard of medieval state finance.

    Those levies weren’t “taxes” in any modern sense. Contemporary chroniclers, legal historians, and economic historians all describe them as:

    – coercive exactions,
    – imposed on a legally vulnerable minority,
    – backed by the Crown’s monopoly on force,
    – and recorded with meticulous precision precisely because they were so significant.

    The fact that the tallage rolls and chirographs sit in the Tower of London is itself a statement: these were not incidental sums. They were central to royal finance, and they were extracted from a community that had no political recourse.”

    Good ol’ King John, a far worse and bigger robber than I realised.

Leave a Reply