Proof that Islam can turn any area, no matter how nice, into a misogynist charnel house

Wherever Islam goes so does violence and extreme misogyny. If you want an illustration of this fact then look no further than the London Borough of Redbridge. This formerly stable area with long standing Jewish and Christian residents, has been subjected to some appalling Islamification that has often been aided and abetted by local politicians, especially Labour Party ones. Redbridge has gone in the space of 5 or so years from an area where people aspired to live in, to a rapidly deteriorating shariah zone. Regular readers of this blog will have seen me write about building thefts by Muslim groups, a former police station taken over by a Muslim women’s group whose views have been described as ‘medieval’, impositions of mosques where they are not wanted along with many of the other ‘quality of life’ issues that come from having Islam in an area.

Now there is another aspect of Islam and multiculturalism come to light that Redbridge can be publicly shamed for, that of so-called ‘honour killing’.

One of the local newspapers for the area the Ilford Recorder (H/T AnonSource1 for the link – thanks) has published the shocking data that Redbridge is now equal with neighbouring Newham (now a frightening, dangerous Islamic shithole where only 17% of White Britons remain) for ‘honour’ violence.

There are some concerns I have about this Ilford Recorder article written by Ajay Nair and published on the 2nd November 2015 and that it because it doesn’t mention the ‘M’ word at all and concentrates on ‘honour’ violence in the Sikh and generic ‘Asian’ communities. Nobody is denying that ‘honour’ violence happens in Sikh and Hindu families but the bulk of it comes from the hyper-misogynist ideology of Islam.

It’s a bit odd that the word ‘Muslim’ was not mentioned at all even though the local police, who normally are apt to indulge in Islamopandering are themselves saying that ‘demographic change’ i.e. more Muslims, is behind the jump in ‘honour’ violence. The other concern is that the newspaper has disallowed comments, probably because they know that readers are likely to point out the worrying omission of the ‘M’ word.

Here’s the article in question from the Ilford Recorder with, as usual, the original report in italics and this blog’s comments in plain text.

The Ilford Recorder said:

Groups working with victims of honour crime have called on the council to do more after new figures detailing the number of reported incidents placed Redbridge joint second in the capital.

If you import Islam then expect to get misogynistic Islamic savagery. It’s not rocket science.

The figures, obtained from a Freedom of Information (FoI) request to police, revealed that the borough had the second highest number of reported honour-based crimes in London with 59 reported since 2010 – joint with Newham.

As I said earlier, Newham has become a hell-hole of monstrous proportions where decent people of all races and all non-Islamic religious paths are leaving and where the local Labour MP, Stephen Timms, sees nothing at all wrong with hobnobbing with the representatives of Hamas.

Topping the list was Brent, which recorded 82 in the same period.

Ah! Brent. A council that has allowed itself to be bullied by the far Left Citizens UK organisation into taking a load of alleged Syrian ‘refugees’ and has long had a reputation for being a Labour madhouse going right back to the 1980’s at least. It’s shocking to put it mildly to see an area like Redbridge sink so low, so quickly merely by the application of Islam. If anyone wants proof that Islam is a ‘social retardant’ then take a look at the jump in ‘honour’ violence levels since the area became more Islamised.

Balvinder Saund, of the Sikh Women’s Alliance (SWA) in Ilford, said the figures were “upsetting”.

The idea of honour is still here,” she said. “It’s about control and subservience. These old ways of thinking should be left behind – there’s no place for it.”

Nothing to disagree with there. However why make a feature of a Sikh organisation when much of the current issues re ‘honour’ violence are coming from the Muslim community? Are the Ilford Recorder trying to play down just how much Islam is ruining the London Borough of Redbridge? It certainly would look that way for the casual reader.

The former councillor, who says there is still “lots of work to be done”, thinks the council should be putting more resources into preventing it.

It’s not more taxpayers money that is needed, it’s less violently misogynist Muslims.

Sudarshan Bhuhi, chief executive officer of charity Aanchal Women’s Aid, which works with victims in Redbridge, said the figures were “not surprising”.

The issue is quite close to my heart,” said Sudharshan, who fears more incidents are going unreported. “I have been working in here and the economic divide is so diverse – there’s not enough funds for specialised support.”

Ms Bhuhi has got completely the wrong end of the stick here. This sort of violence is not down to ‘economic divides’ or any other such excuses, it is mostly down to Islam. You could throw endless money at projects to stop ‘honour’ violence and it would have little effect on that perpetrated by Muslims. It would, and indeed is, having an affect with Sikhs and Hindus, but then these groups are much more loyal, respectful and integrated than Muslims. With Muslims any money will be wasted as Islamic misogyny runs so deep within that ideology. The council might as well just empty sacks of taxpayer cash into the River Roding for all the good it will do to stop Islamic ‘honour’ based violence.

According to the Metropolitan Police website, honour-based crime is “any criminal offence that is driven by a mistaken desire to protect the cultural or traditional beliefs of a family or community”.

Thanks for the patronising definition, I think the Met will find that many of us know that already.

Redbridge Police’s Det Insp Frank Copley said: “The figures quoted are extremely low across the Met Police area. Although still low, it is slightly higher than most in Redbridge. This is likely to be because of demographics.

What a simpering fools is this DI Copley. The only demographic issue that relevant here is the Islamification of Redbridge. Tell the truth man, you never know people might actually respect you for it?

It is possible that there is unreported honour-based violence occurring in Redbridge but I encourage all victims to come forward.”

Who in their right mind trusts the police these days? After Rotherham and other places where Islamic Rape Gangs have been ignored by the police, I find I don’t trust them either. The comments from this officer smack distinctly of ‘we’ve got to be seen to be doing something’.

A Redbridge Council spokeswoman said the council commissioned services to help victims and encouraged people to access services such as the Ascent project, which is funded by London councils.

More expense for the hard-pressed taxpayers of Redbridge who will be squeezed to pay for the tragic effects of Islamic misogyny along with the other unnecessary costs of Islam.

She said: “It’s difficult to know how unreported a particular crime is without more evidence but the council and its partners carry out a lot of work to encourage victims to come forward.

Honour-based crime also forms part of our Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy and we work hard encourage people to come forward. Part of this strategy includes rationalising and improving local services for women and girls who are subject to any form of violence.”

Oooh! Let’s have a ‘strategy’ shall we. If a council has a ‘strategy’ it doesn’t mean that they have do anything about the problem or name the communal ideological perpetrator, it’s too often a cop out. However, having a ‘strategy’ does mean that when things go tits up and Islamic enslavement of women is uncovered in the council’s area, they can at least point to the fact that the council has a ‘strategy’ to cover it, or as is more usual in Labour areas, cover it up.

I would hazard a guess that ‘honour’ violence was a problem for Sikh and Hindu women of Redbridge but not a major problem. It’s only with the arrival and establishment of Islam that such problems have become more and more serious.

Redbridge is a sad but illustrative example of how far an area can fall if Islam is injected into it, and if Islam is pandered to. Let this be a lesson to those who live in those areas of Britain that are thankfully currently without much of an Islamic infection, and that lesson is this: Resist Islam and those who wish to impose it on your area because once Islam is allowed to establish itself in a town or city, then the area will quickly deteriorate at a shocking pace.

Links

‘Honour’ violence grows in Redbridge

http://www.ilfordrecorder.co.uk/news/crime-court/redbridge_has_second_highest_number_of_reports_of_honour_crime_in_london_1_4293767

Please note there are a considerable number of stories about Redbridge on the Fahrenheit211 website. To find them please put the words ‘Redbridge’ or ‘London Borough of Redbridge’ into the search box on the right hand side of the page.

Stephen Timms MP for East Ham in Redbridge’s neighbouring borough of Newham. A man also known as ‘The representative for Islamabad West and Hamas’.

https://www.fahrenheit211.net/2015/11/01/from-elsewhere-just-when-you-think-stephen-timms-mp-could-not-get-any-worse/

5 Comments on "Proof that Islam can turn any area, no matter how nice, into a misogynist charnel house"

  1. English, still here... just. | November 5, 2015 at 1:46 pm |

    Off topic, slightly, but check out “The New Observer”
    Just Google it.
    Makes a change from our own biased, censored media.
    Then make your own minds up.

    • Fahrenheit211 | November 7, 2015 at 7:40 pm |

      I’ve seen it, and I’ve made up my mind. I’m afraid won’t be using it as a source nor will I be quoting from it. It’s a site that has got a heavy and quite nasty undercurrent of Jew-hatred, which for me is an absolute no no, and there is a lot of the sort of ‘scientific racism’ that has no place in debates about competing ideologies and is a distraction from the true fight, that of fighting Islamofascism. It’s one of those sites that will go on my ‘do not quote from or reference’ list which includes prison planet, info wars, stormfront and similar sites.

  2. The Ilford Recorder & Ajay Nair have no problem using the word Muslim, when they wish to attempt to portray a Council owned local community centre as belonging to Muslims.

    http://www.ilfordrecorder.co.uk/news/environment/council_clears_hainault_community_centre_over_licence_breach_claims_1_3818530

    This is the same Community Centre, a Council owned building, and former working mans club, known as Jacques Hall in Hainault, that has been stolen from the local community, with all manner of rules imposed to put off non Muslims from using the hall.

    The lies and smears of local residents from the current incumbents continue, while the politicans look at their navals and pretend nothing is wrong…..

  3. Met Police say honour crimes driven by mistaken desire to protect family and culture. Wrong!
    When people suffer from madness their first instinct is to hide the fact from others and it helps to keep criticising the imagined enemy. Honour wounding and slaughter are activities enjoyed by the insane, notice the laughter.

Comments are closed.