I thought long and hard about who or what was going to be this month’s Neville Chamberlain simulacrum, and sadly I have a lot to choose from. It could be the Labour Party who appear to have benefited from a flurry of late, possibly bent, Islamic postal votes in Oldham, or David Cameron uttering yet again the dishonest phrase ‘Islam is a religion of peace’. However, after much consideration I’ve decided to give this month’s ‘British Neville Award’ to a group that continues to feed and support those who are enemies of this country.
This month’s award goes to the naïve fools and deluded Leftists of the Ross for Refugees group, based in Ross on Wye in Herefordshire. Even after the appalling and tragic attacks in Paris by Muslim terrorists, and the connections these terrorists had with the refugee invasion threatening Europe, the representatives of Ross for Refugees want on record as saying they would continue their work. The group made a breathtaking statement that is either naïve or knowingly dishonest when they said that the Paris attack illustrated ‘the sort of violence that the refugees were fleeing from’. Wrong! They illustrate the sort of violence that these ‘refugees’ are bringing with them.
What utter crap does fall like a torrent from the mouths of these deluded fools of the Ross for Refugees group, as they try to morally justify their quest to feed those alleged ‘refugees’ at Calais and Dunkirk? They either know not, or care not, that a sizable number of the ‘refugees’ that they are feeding and supporting would quite happily cut our throats or self detonate on a bus if they got the chance. What Ross for Refugees are doing is nothing more than feeding the enemies of the British people and assisting these ‘refugees’ in their quest for British dole cheques, British housing, British rape victims and potential terror targets in Britain. That sort of behaviour should not be allowed to pass without criticism.
The members of Ross for Refugees seem not to have heard or understood the fact that a considerable number of Jihadists are mixed in with these refugees. According to a Lebanese minister quoted by the Daily Mail, at a minimum, 2% of those posing as refugees could well be Jihadists aligned with ISIS, and other sources such as the Daily Express as quoted by Jihadwatch, give a figure of 4000 Jihadis that have already entered Europe from Syria. Has it not occurred to the fools of the Ross for Refugees group that some of those that they are feeding and housing and pandering to may well be Jihadists who have been embedded at these ‘refugee’ camps? The answer to that question would be, probably not, because with people like Ross for Refugees, who are so dead set on their ideological path that they can try to play down the Paris massacre, the truth will not make any impact on them whatsoever. They are blinkered to the danger that the free world faces from these alleged ‘refugees’. They continue on their morally bankrupt path because the lie which says ‘these are genuine refugees’ is much more comforting that the truth, which is ‘these alleged refugees are a threat’.
Therefore it is for their wanton, suicidal and quasi-criminal stupidity that Ross for Refugees are being given the Neville Award this month. In the face of overwhelming evidence that these ‘refugees’ are a danger to us all, they, Ross for Refugees, still insist on feeding and housing them. It’s an unpleasant fact for some to have to comprehend, but the free world is at war with the unfree world of Islam, an ideology that a lot of these Calais migrants follow, which means that they follow an enemy ideology which is as great, if not more of a threat to the UK as Nazism or Communism.
It has to be said that by continuing to support the ‘refugees’ and the embedded Jihadists of Calais and Dunkirk, Ross for Refugees are behaving in a quite worryingly treasonous manner in this war. Feeding and clothing the enemy, not those I might add who are legitimate POW’s, but those who are actively seeking to destroy us, our nation and our culture, is not that morally different from a British person during World War II deliberately putting out lights to guide German U Boats by night. The self-righteous stupidity and gormlessness of the likes of Ross for Refugees makes me want to vomit, because they are not just ignoring a problem, which is bad enough, they are encouraging a problem to continue.
So for supporting those who wish to oppress and destroy us, and for failing to learn the tragic lessons of Paris, Ross for Refugees are this month’s winner of the British Neville Chamberlain award because they continue to pander to those who should by now be seen as an obvious threat to us all.
Links
Previous articles about ‘Ross for Refugees’ from Fahrenheit211
Article One – The Morons of the Marches
Article Two – Ross for Refugees, still crazy after four weeks and a massacre.
Daily Mail article on jihadists embedded with the refugees
Jihadwatch on embedded Jihadists
Those idiots will think it’s a badge of approbation
Numb from the hair down.
They are indeed positively brain-dead. I wondered whether I was being a little harsh in referring to Ross for Refugees as ‘traitors’, but on the other hand what else do you call those who feed and comfort those who have malevolence in their hearts towards us all?
I understand your angst at the actions of these people but I do wish you would not connect their actions with those of Chamberlain. As early as 1937 Chamberlain was aware of the rise of the Nazi military machine and that Britain was totally unprepared for any confrontation. Knowing that there were quite a few people in high and powerful places who supported Hitler’s views, he quietly arranged for the Armed forces to be brought up to strength. His Munich episode bought some much needed time for this country and his policies allowed Britain to recover from Dunkirk and fight the Battle of Britain. Even Churchill, while publicly criticising his policies, referred to his gratitude at Chamberlain’s foresight. Politics is a dirty business, Chamberlain knew this and made the ultimate (political) sacrifice – his name and reputation – to enable this country to survive. If he had been as incapable as history suggests, this would be in German and our national anthem would be ‘Deutschland Uber Alles’.
Oh I absolutely agree with you that Chamberlain, for all his faults, did buy Britain some time to re-arm and he did it in the face of much opposition from the pacifist lobby (and it’s completely understandable where that pacifist lobby came from, the horrors of WWI). However, despite all that, Chamberlain has since his time in office become a notorious byword for a failed policy, that of appeasement of tyrants, and that is why I use him as an illustration of the dangers of appeasement just as others have used him.
“……I use him as an illustration of appeasement…….” Even if he didn’t actually appease? Try Quisling or Benedict Arnold. To continue to use Chamberlain’s name in this context just to make a point is to strengthen the historical inaccuracy. He deserves better.
Oh I’ve got plenty of people in mind for a comparison with Mr Arnold and Quisling would most aptly fit some of our more overtly useless public servants. Seriously, I understand about the historical inaccuracy but in the public’s mind Chamberlain is, for good or ill, associated with the failed policy of appeasement, and the image of Chamberlain’s paper waving sums up both the futility and danger of thinking that an aggressor can be bought off or will keep to bargains. Popular history may well indeed have judged Chamberlain harshly, and unjustly so even, but I’m going to keep using him for pointing out problematical individuals and groups because of what the image represents to the viewer. Sometimes a meme has great power even if it is somewhat disconnected from the actual history or story, it’s like how people refer to ‘three wise men’ in the nativity story but the text itself doesn’t mention any number of Magi.
I regret am unable to agree with your philosophy. This type of thinking is why, for instance, Margaret Thatcher is remembered for destroying the mining industry when Harold Wilson and Tony Benn closed twice as many mines as those closed under Thatcher ‘s watch. Using such selective examples lessens the strength of your views and comments. Sorry.
Fair do’s. As I said I can really appreciate where you are coming from and the comparison with Thatcher and the miners is a good one. It would be a boring world if we all agreed.