The phrase ‘Muslim spared gaol’ is becoming far too common for my liking. Whether it be for a minor sexual offence such as wanking in a public place, some violent public disorder or in this spectacularly awful case, killing a father of eight. The phrase ‘community service’ or ‘non custodial sentence’ is too often applied to Muslim offenders, even when the offence deserves imprisonment. It’s increasingly a phrase associated with Muslims who commit crimes for which the rest of us would be looking at a long time inside prison for.

The latest monstrosity of a judicial decision concerns the case of one Sajid Hussain who fell asleep at the wheel of his car because his body was affected by Ramadan fasting. The car carrying the sleeping Islamic savage then ploughed into a nearby car where a father was putting his youngest child into a car seat, killing 47 year old father of eight David Hinton.

Amazingly this Islamic savage was able to get a far lesser sentence than he should have done merely by saying that he was fasting for Ramadan. That is no real excuse for this savages actions but it seems the judge has believed him and he has walked. This is not justice nowhere near. When a tired driver fell asleep at the wheel and caused a train crash at Selby in Yorkshire in 2001 which killed ten people, the driver who caused the accident got five years inside. Why was this Islamic savage not also disposed of in a similar way. Because this savage drove whilst incapacitated due to Ramadan fasting he has created one widow and eight orphans. This savage should be counting the bricks in his cell not walking the streets following a derisory sentence.

Here’s how Breitbart has reported this latest case of Muslims getting advantageous justice out of the British legal system.

Brietbart said:

“A Muslim postman who fell asleep at the wheel and killed a father-of-eight while fasting for Ramadan has been been told he will not be going to jail for his offence.

Sajid Hussain, 36, claimed he ‘dozed off’ before his Volkswagen Polo crashed into David Hinton (pictured above, right), 47, at 2pm on June 20 last year. The tragic road accident happened as Mr Hinton was at the side of the road strapping his baby boy into his car.

He and his wife Nadine, 34, had been taking their youngest children, Christopher, two, and Oliver, five, to see a Wendy House at Oakham Road in Dudley, West Mids.

Local residents heard the noise of the smash, which Mrs Hinton described as being like an explosion, and rushed to help her husband.

The Daily Mail reports Mr Hussain, who lives in the town, had not eaten since 3.30am as he was fasting for Ramadan and had been working since 4.30am.

Prosecutor Simon Ward said: “There was nothing we can see that would have caused Mr Hussein to take evasive action.

“The visibility on that road was very good and it was only mildly damp. He was doing around 30mph – which was the speed limit.

“Mr Hussain had been fasting for Ramadan, but there was no abnormalities in his blood sugar levels and medics are quite satisfied that he had not had a stroke.

“The only conclusion is that he must have dozed off.”

Sentencing, Judge James Burbidge described the crash and its emotional impact to Wolverhampton Crown Court.

He said: “The force was such that the Peugeot ended up on the other side of the road and facing the other way round. Mrs Hinton has the trauma of seeing her husband lying face down on the road.

“Their baby had been thrown in the air and was upside down. Mr Hussain was described as standing with his head in his hands, screaming, ‘No! No!’

“Witnesses driving behind said Mr Hussain’s brake lights did not come on.”

The judge ruled that the Dudley postman, who bowed his head and wept throughout the hearing, had showed “genuine remorse”.

Mr Hussain received a driving ban, will have to retake his test before regaining his licence, and was ordered to carry out 200 hours unpaid community service.

Even taking into account the lesser number of deaths in this case when compared with the Selby case, this is still an astonishingly lenient sentence. Here we have a Muslim who knowing he must be woozy from lack of food and an extremely early start to the day, gets into a car and kills another person whilst incapacitated, yet he walks from court.

If you or I as non-Muslims went without food and water for nearly twelve hours on a summers day then got into a car, fell asleep and killed someone, then we’d be looking at a sentence a lot more substantial than 200 hours of community service and a driving ban. The Crown Prosecution guidelines for sentencing in cases of Death by Careless driving, state that the judge should have started to look at a tariff of three years imprisonment. Getting into a car knowing that you are incapacitated through hunger,certainly looks extremely careless to me.

Yet again we have a situation where there appears to be one law for the Muslims and another for everyone else. Hussain has been dealt with advantageously because he was a Muslim and because he was fasting for Ramadan. What Hussain got out of the court isn’t justice, it’s not nearly enough of a punishment to be called justice.

An innocent man is dead, purely because this particular Islamic savage decided that his religious rules were more important than ensuring he was safe behind the wheel of a car.