Mark Field MP did nothing wrong.

Mark Field removes protestor from Mansion House Dinner (pic from Daily Star)

 

The Labour Party and the left leaning Mainstream Media are having a fit of the vapours this morning over the forcible ejection by Tory MP Mark Field of a female Greenpeace protestor who had gatecrashed the annual Mansion House Dinner. The protestor, one of forty who disrupted the dinner, was apprehended by Mr Field and forcibly removed from the dining hall by him.

Video of the event shows Mr Field realising that there was an intruder in the building who was carrying something at her chest and carrying a bag over her left shoulder and who was coming towards him. The video then shows Mr Field standing up from his seat and blocking the protestors way by grabbing at her arm, turning her around and pushing her out with his hands on the back of her neck and on what looks like her right arm. Having watched the video a few times it seems to me that Mr Field acted with the minimum necessary and reasonable force in the circumstances.

I must admit that for protestors from the increasingly left wing Greenpeace group to gain access to the Mansion House Dinner represents a shocking and worrying lapse in security. The Mansion House Dinner has a list of extremely important guests including the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Governor of the Bank of England among many others. Many of the guests are the sort of individuals who are prime targets for attack by Islamic terrorists or from one of the Irish Republican terrorist splinter groups. I’m gobsmacked to think that a bunch of thirty easily identified protestors, wearing an ersatz uniform of red outfits, could easily manage to get into the Mansion House dining hall. Those who carried out this protest could just as easily have been violent terrorists intent on mass murder instead of the self proclaimed peaceful protestors of Greenpeace.

From what I can see Mr Field really did nothing wrong here. He spotted an intruder, interdicted her and steered her out of the hall quickly and in a manner that is unlikely to leave the protestor with any serious injury. These are the facts as shown by the video but that this has not deterred the authoritarians and social justice warriors of the Labour Party from coming out and speaking their brains on the matter.

Labour’s Shadow Women’s minister Dawn Butler called the removal of the protestor ‘horrific’ and whined on about how Mr Field had committed an act of ‘violence against women’. She also in an example of complete hyperbole, called for Mr Field to be either suspended or sacked from job as a Foreign and Commonwealth Office minister. This is utter cynical and exploitative bollocks from Ms Butler. Mr Field removed a protestor from the hall with the minimum violence. Others when confronted with a person who they do not know and who may be either a peaceful protestor or a terrorist, might have been more forceful to this lefty Greenpeace type and smacked her in the mouth. Frankly, this protestor got off lightly in the circumstances.

Another Labour MP, Jess Phillips, fresh from her laughable performance in telling a group of Birmingham Muslims that they are doing ‘Islam wrong’ and whining about Sargon of Akkad’s statement that he would ‘not rape Jess Phillips’, also decided to speak her mind. She said that the protestor ‘didn’t pose a threat’ to Mr Field or others. I’m racking my brains to work out why she thinks this is the case? From Mr Field’s seated position he would be roughly eye level with the protestors chest and slightly above the level of her bag. It’s likely that neither of her hands were completely visible to Mr Field and therefore Mr Field was correct in assuming that she could have been carrying anything, including a weapon. From what I could see I would have reacted exactly the same as Mr Field did if I was in the same position as him and unsure of the nature of the threat.

Jess Phillips has got it wrong again, it was quite easy to perceive that this protestor could have been a potential threat and when dealing with such threats you don’t hang around and engage in long drawn out judgement processes, you just have to act.

Following the incident, various busybodies and activists seem to have made third party reports of criminal wrongdoing by Mr Field to the City of London Police. This means that Mr Field will be subject to a police investigation and all that entails. Mr Field has also voluntarily contacted the Cabinet Office in order that he be investigated as to whether or not he broke the Ministerial Code.

What gets me is that those Labour MP’s who are whining about Mr Field’s behaviour in ejecting the protestor are probably the very first ones who would whine on interminably about how ‘my security is at risk’ when they merely get words as pushback for their actions and policies. Jess Phillips is a prime example of this sort of hypocrisy. She hauled her arse around TV studio after TV studio to whinge about ‘her safety’ was being compromised by a non-existent rape threat and mercilessly smeared the man who said that he ‘wouldn’t rape Jess Phillips’. She is the very last person who is morally qualified to tell Mr Field that he was wrong in physically ejecting this protestor of that she ‘didn’t represent a threat’.

The statements by Dawn Butler and Jess Phillips, as well as being two faced, at least show us what side of the fence Labour stands when it comes to what causes and behaviours that they support. The statements have shown that this party favours those who disrupt events held by those whom they perceive as opponents. However it is more than likely that if this sort of behaviour was aimed at Labour people and Labour events, this party would be singing a completely different tune. As I said earlier, this protestor got off very lightly and it makes me wonder how a similar protestor would fare if they entered a Labour Party meeting and encountered some of Corbyn’s Momentum thugs?

I hope Mr Field manages to get his name cleared quickly as he really hasn’t done anything that any other normal person would have done in the circumstances. I also hope that these protestors are brought to court and that there is an urgent review of security surrounding the Mansion House Dinner and similar events. Today it was a group of left wing bullies screaming about climate change, tomorrow it might be a mad and self-exploding Muslim screaming ‘Allah hu Akbar’.

2 Comments on "Mark Field MP did nothing wrong."

  1. The BBC article is nauseating—so many white knights, we should be retaking Constantinople. Sarah Wollaston (CUK) wrote, ‘Absolutely shameful, a male MP marching a woman out of a room by her neck.’

    Noted Canadian MRA Karen Straughan described social attitudes to men and women very well here:

    [T]raditionalism throws men under the bus and then tells them they’re heroes (and gives them respect). Feminism throws men under the bus for the exact same reasons and in the exact same ways, and then tells them they’re s**t and spits on them.

    Traditionalism makes sense in that it says, “We demand more of men than women, so therefore we give men more authority.” Feminism says, “We demand more of men than women, so therefore we blame men for everything.”

    Traditionalism is honest in that it says, “We insist that men be the protectors and providers of women because women need that.” Feminism says, “We insist that men be the protectors and providers of women because men for the last 10,000 years oppressed and subjugated women for their own benefit because they’re sociopathic monsters, and now it’s payback time. Also, because treating women equally has resulted in some very unequal treatment of women, because reasons.”

    Traditionalism is consistent in that it says, “We demand that women be treated more gently than men because they’re less capable of dealing with adversity.” Feminism says, “Women are every bit as capable of dealing with adversity as men, but they have more adversity to deal with because men are horrible violent rapey b*****ds. Also, have you heard of HeForShe? It’s a revolutionary new thing that looks exactly like traditional masculinity, except that the men are default villains instead of default heroes.”

    Feminism has adopted and exploited all the most anti-male aspects of traditionalism, and has discarded all the pro-male aspects of it (and by pro-male, I don’t even mean that men are treated well—just that there is some reward for the sacrifice, even if it’s inadequate). Traditionalism said, “Hey men, you’re not all bad. If you do X, Y and Z, you’ll be a good man.” Feminism says, “Hey men, you’re pigs. Oh, and just go ahead and become male feminists because that’s the only way we’ll like you, except we won’t even then, so sit down and shut the f*** up you entitled b*****ds, how dare you expect one damn thing from the women you’ve devoted your lives to? A*sholes.”

    (She is well worth checking out: of sufficient status to have been interviewed by Dave Rubin and Steven Crowder amongst others, she has also spoken at US Libertarian Party Conventions (not on the same level as addressing the RNC as Ann Coulter has, but not too shabby either). She’s also active on social media and you could start with her ‘gilded’ comments here (the dreadful SJW s**tpile of a platform that is ‘plebbit’—but what platform isn’t an SJW s**tpile these days?). She has a YT channel (recommend her public speaking engagements and digging out her early videos) and an infrequently updated blog.)

    Jess Phillips has got it wrong again’? She is just using the tools Late Western Society handed her. There’s no point in looking for wisdom or sense or logic or consistency or anything else from such as her—it’s all about power. «Кто кого?» as Lenin asked—‘Who, whom?’ It’s only about whose boot is stamping on whose face. Give her the opportunity and she would be another Lavrenti Beria.
    Fully a part of the Political-Media Establishment, she can dismiss her own words (‘knif[ing] Jeremy Corbyn in the front’) as a joke while simultaneously claiming that she ‘cried in the street’ after another’s joke—and no-one will ever call her in on it, not her hypocrisy, nor how a Member of our Parliament (which once boasted heroes like Sir Thomas Picton who fought in Spain and was killed at Waterloo while MP for Pembroke), who is supposed to be dealing with issues such as crime, terrorism, possible international conflict, potential NUCLEAR ARMA-f***ing-GEDDON with Russia if we don’t pull our head out of our ar*es, is publicly blubbing over words. Because she is Establishment.

    And against her and the rest of the Establishment are just our scattered small voices in the wilderness with our precious ‘democracy’ and our votes (if they’re not being burned)—one voice amongst 46,833,158. Like having free speech at a football match: you’re having an erudite discussion while 50,000 people either side of you are chanting, ‘You’re s**t and you know you are,’ at each other, while the few running the show rake in the money and don’t even give a toss who wins the match.

  2. Imagine if a female threw a male out of the room in the same manner. She would be hailed as a hero by the public. You can’t have it all ways ladies.

Comments are closed.